yes, that spritesheet generator is an awesome tool and if in the good hands, combining it with an A.I. you can get great personalized results for your assets and you spare the time of creating the base images for the dual conditioning. Good advice to combine both worlds! I don't think we would see a software that combine generative art with that sprite sheet generator any time soon, but using the best of those tools and combining them manually should not be too hard I think.
Hi, I want to share what I've learnt about A.I. and copyright in this regards with the hope it would be of any use:
- A.I. art of any type can not be copyrighted.
- The only way to copyright content generated with A.I. as CC0 or any creative commons license would be by making sure that the model used was trained with CC0 or content or any compatible license.
- It is impossible to prove the source of any generated A.I. content, you can never know how any derivated content has been achieved or which model was used and how it was trained.
In my opinion, if the new chord that you generated does not exist and is not copyrighted, it should be fine to use , but I'm afraid I have none to say about what is permited in OGA and I'm also not a lawyer so this is not by any means advice.
To me a chord that does not belong to any copyrighted song is a new chord and it doesn't matter if it came out of your mind of an A.I. and who will be able to know how you did it?
I guess you know the story of the A.I. generated art that won a price in colorado (more info in wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%A9%C3%A2tre_D%27op%C3%A9ra_Spatial), it is relevant I think because the person who won the prize and generated the art tried to copyright the art and this was what happened:
"the Copyright Office Review Board made a final determination and found that Théâtre D'Opéra Spatial was not eligible for copyright protection as the human creative input was de minimis, with the AI-generated elements dominating."
So according to what happened in that case, if the A.I. does not "dominate" the work you are doing it should not be considered A.I. generated, otherwise yes.
yes, that spritesheet generator is an awesome tool and if in the good hands, combining it with an A.I. you can get great personalized results for your assets and you spare the time of creating the base images for the dual conditioning. Good advice to combine both worlds! I don't think we would see a software that combine generative art with that sprite sheet generator any time soon, but using the best of those tools and combining them manually should not be too hard I think.
I'm glad to read you like it, it please me to read that from the authors of the track. Thanks for sharing such great tracks and bring me inspiration.
I love both statues, very nice lighting, textures and shadows, well done!
I used the older statue, this is some art I created, rendered with a shader in realtime in a game.
Perfect for stealth games, I can visualize some scenes as I listen to the music. Very atmospheric as always, I love it.
the texture and light reflections looks fantastic. I like it.
I love them, I thogh you may like to see how they look in my game: https://codeberg.org/glitchapp/MadWheelZ
Thank you Tausdei, I love to read that from the author of the tracks! I love the tracks and I had a lot of fun mixing them.
Thank you MedicineStorm, I'm glad to read you like the mix.
I guess I'm kind of inspired these days :)
I've just corrected the license, hopefully is right now.
Thank you Umplix for sharing such great music, I had a lot of fun mixing it!
Hi, I want to share what I've learnt about A.I. and copyright in this regards with the hope it would be of any use:
- A.I. art of any type can not be copyrighted.
- The only way to copyright content generated with A.I. as CC0 or any creative commons license would be by making sure that the model used was trained with CC0 or content or any compatible license.
- It is impossible to prove the source of any generated A.I. content, you can never know how any derivated content has been achieved or which model was used and how it was trained.
In my opinion, if the new chord that you generated does not exist and is not copyrighted, it should be fine to use , but I'm afraid I have none to say about what is permited in OGA and I'm also not a lawyer so this is not by any means advice.
To me a chord that does not belong to any copyrighted song is a new chord and it doesn't matter if it came out of your mind of an A.I. and who will be able to know how you did it?
I guess you know the story of the A.I. generated art that won a price in colorado (more info in wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%A9%C3%A2tre_D%27op%C3%A9ra_Spatial), it is relevant I think because the person who won the prize and generated the art tried to copyright the art and this was what happened:
"the Copyright Office Review Board made a final determination and found that Théâtre D'Opéra Spatial was not eligible for copyright protection as the human creative input was de minimis, with the AI-generated elements dominating."
So according to what happened in that case, if the A.I. does not "dominate" the work you are doing it should not be considered A.I. generated, otherwise yes.
Pages