Both of those were visible for several days on the front page's "latest art" section. Actually, the furniture one is still visible in "latest art" and both are visible in "popular this week" right now.
That is a reasonable concern, though. We want artists submissions to be visible for a decent period. What would you suggest as a solution? I have been encouraging submitters to consolidate thier submissions (it's better for everyone anyway, the artists tend to get more attention when their stuff is in a cohesive set) but how do we enforce that besides asking?
Indeed. Why not only have a "2D art" category since even 3D models are represented on a 2D screen and therefore 2D. Even audio files are 1D waveforms stretched onto an amplitude axis and therefore 2D. :)
Thanks for the update. Philosophically, categories are pointless. Categorically, proper organization is important. :P
Interesting calibration tool. Seems useful. Thanks for sharing it.
I don't think there is any need to separate the images or change the file format. I was wondering why it is categorized as "2D art" instead of "Texture".
Remember, to participate in the art challenge, your tags must include "A New Look" (not "ANewLook") and "Challenge". This should also be in the "Concept Art" category (not "2D art", and not with a tag "Concept")
??
Both of those were visible for several days on the front page's "latest art" section. Actually, the furniture one is still visible in "latest art" and both are visible in "popular this week" right now.
That is a reasonable concern, though. We want artists submissions to be visible for a decent period. What would you suggest as a solution? I have been encouraging submitters to consolidate thier submissions (it's better for everyone anyway, the artists tend to get more attention when their stuff is in a cohesive set) but how do we enforce that besides asking?
Indeed. Why not only have a "2D art" category since even 3D models are represented on a 2D screen and therefore 2D. Even audio files are 1D waveforms stretched onto an amplitude axis and therefore 2D. :)
Thanks for the update. Philosophically, categories are pointless. Categorically, proper organization is important. :P
Interesting calibration tool. Seems useful. Thanks for sharing it.
I don't think there is any need to separate the images or change the file format. I was wondering why it is categorized as "2D art" instead of "Texture".
Isn't this more of a texture?
cool! Why not upload the .blend file instead and categorize it as 3D art? I think that would be more popular and useful. :)
Nice.
Remember, to participate in the art challenge, your tags must include "A New Look" (not "ANewLook") and "Challenge". This should also be in the "Concept Art" category (not "2D art", and not with a tag "Concept")
was spam. Thanks for pointing it out.
looks good!
(Be sure to include Butch's attribution instructions and adhere to the CC-BY-SA license: "Credit me as Buch and link back to my OGA profile page")
nice!
Is this more of a texture?
Looks good to me. Thanks! :)
Pages