I suspect they either paid him for a non-BY license, or we just aren't seeing where he is listed in the credits. Matthew Pablo isn't exactly a stranger to working on big commercial productions: https://matthewpablo.com/music/video-game-music/
Why? I don't necessarily disagree, but "feeling" like something just should be so is not persuasive. If there is logic behind the feeling, input is welcome.
The question is about derivation: Imagine if the reference image used was of proprietary content; such as an image of commander Shepard from Mass Effect. The model that was created with that reference would be a derivative of copyrighted content (depending on how the reference was used.)
Why shouldn't a model made with AI-generated reference images be a derivative of AI content? Again, that is not a rhetorical question that secretly means "a model made with AI-generated reference images should be a derivative of AI content." I am genuinely seeking input on reasons to the contrary.
This shouldn't be in the 3D art category if it is just a 2D image. Please change the category to 2D, or upload a 3D model file.
Assets created with the assistance of AI must be declared as such in the description. See https://opengameart.org/content/art-submission-guidelines#ai - Indicate the AI technology used, including specific version and/or model date. - Include a URL to that AI technology's Terms of Use page.
No response from submitter. Unless information can be provided about the nature of the tools used, I must assume the AI tools in soundtrap were used. As such, the AI submission guidelines have to be applied. Otherwise, I must remove this submission soon.
I suspect they either paid him for a non-BY license, or we just aren't seeing where he is listed in the credits. Matthew Pablo isn't exactly a stranger to working on big commercial productions: https://matthewpablo.com/music/video-game-music/
Is it? They must have got it from Matthew. That's pretty cool. He uploaded this song here 6 months before the game came out.
No response from submitter. Unless the information can be added soon, I must remove this submission.
Why? I don't necessarily disagree, but "feeling" like something just should be so is not persuasive. If there is logic behind the feeling, input is welcome.
The question is about derivation: Imagine if the reference image used was of proprietary content; such as an image of commander Shepard from Mass Effect. The model that was created with that reference would be a derivative of copyrighted content (depending on how the reference was used.)
Why shouldn't a model made with AI-generated reference images be a derivative of AI content?
Again, that is not a rhetorical question that secretly means "a model made with AI-generated reference images should be a derivative of AI content." I am genuinely seeking input on reasons to the contrary.
These look great.
can you please link to the specific HDRI's used?EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
- Indicate the AI technology used, including specific version and/or model date.
- Include a URL to that AI technology's Terms of Use page.
No response from submitter. Unless information can be provided about the nature of the tools used, I must assume the AI tools in soundtrap were used. As such, the AI submission guidelines have to be applied. Otherwise, I must remove this submission soon.
This was uploaded here in 2013. It could be whoever made the game maker addon got it from here.
Click on the link beneath the word File(s):
How many years back?
Pages