Just FYI, tags like "Royalty Free", "Music", "Song", etc. are redundant. It is already in the Music art category, and everything on the site is royalty free. See http://opengameart.org/content/art-tags for some effective tagging tips. :)
@ghostie: We really do need to know what the original artwork is from for the "Share Alike" clause to be satisfied. Until then I have to mark this with a potential licensing issue. Only temporary, of course. We just need to make sure the original artist is credited properly. :) let me know if you have any questions.
Based on the licenses selected, it also requires you to indicate where the original came from and attribute the original author. What are these modifications of?
@WithTheLove: Ah. I see. Thank makes more sense. It seemed obvious to me there was no intent to implement the example layout exactly as it is now, but was instead intended to be a "first step" demonstration of a potential layout. Looks like that was not quite as obvious to others. Still, as you say, if there is something we don't like about the example layout, we should be discussing how to improve it beyond "this layout is borked! It should be fixed!"
@TheOuterLinux: Sorry, I thought you were previously saying the layout should be kept and have no new layout at all, not that the new layout should try to imitate the current one. Is that what you are suggesting? I assumed this more recent response was attempting to add a new suggestion.
I am interested in an OGA layout art challenge! that sounds fun, but there doesn't seem to be enough interest in hosting the art challenges. As I mentioned earlier, I don't have enough time to handle the basic site administration as well as art challenges by myself (not counting my other time-consuming obligations :) If anyone is interested in helping out, let's do this! :D
You want all the authors as contributors? The collection automatically tracks the list of authors regardless of them being a contributor on the collection or not. Contributors of a collection are able to modify it as if they were the owner of the collection.
@Justanasian: He isn't currently, but he was intimately afilliated with Mojang at the time he made Infinite Mario, which is what this submission is referencing. :)
Sorry, i don't think it's too much to ask artists to include more tags than just "soundtrack" and "music". I'm not talking about submitters like joth; his tags have the kind of categorical descriptions we need. Those are far from the majority, though. If submitters don't want anyone to ever find their submissions, then by all means don't take the 60 seconds it requires to give more than two descriptive tags to your music.
Nice, but why not have all the animations for this character under a single cohesive submission?
@grafxkid: when this spritesheet was made, were there any other assets used as a guide to create it?
Nice.
Just FYI, tags like "Royalty Free", "Music", "Song", etc. are redundant. It is already in the Music art category, and everything on the site is royalty free. See http://opengameart.org/content/art-tags for some effective tagging tips. :)
@ghostie: We really do need to know what the original artwork is from for the "Share Alike" clause to be satisfied. Until then I have to mark this with a potential licensing issue. Only temporary, of course. We just need to make sure the original artist is credited properly. :) let me know if you have any questions.
Based on the licenses selected, it also requires you to indicate where the original came from and attribute the original author. What are these modifications of?
@WithTheLove: Ah. I see. Thank makes more sense. It seemed obvious to me there was no intent to implement the example layout exactly as it is now, but was instead intended to be a "first step" demonstration of a potential layout. Looks like that was not quite as obvious to others. Still, as you say, if there is something we don't like about the example layout, we should be discussing how to improve it beyond "this layout is borked! It should be fixed!"
@TheOuterLinux: Sorry, I thought you were previously saying the layout should be kept and have no new layout at all, not that the new layout should try to imitate the current one. Is that what you are suggesting? I assumed this more recent response was attempting to add a new suggestion.
I am interested in an OGA layout art challenge! that sounds fun, but there doesn't seem to be enough interest in hosting the art challenges. As I mentioned earlier, I don't have enough time to handle the basic site administration as well as art challenges by myself (not counting my other time-consuming obligations :) If anyone is interested in helping out, let's do this! :D
You want all the authors as contributors? The collection automatically tracks the list of authors regardless of them being a contributor on the collection or not. Contributors of a collection are able to modify it as if they were the owner of the collection.
@Justanasian: He isn't currently, but he was intimately afilliated with Mojang at the time he made Infinite Mario, which is what this submission is referencing. :)
That is gorgeous! Extrapolating from your rates above, a scene like the "agift" one would cost me about $416? :)
Sorry, i don't think it's too much to ask artists to include more tags than just "soundtrack" and "music". I'm not talking about submitters like joth; his tags have the kind of categorical descriptions we need. Those are far from the majority, though. If submitters don't want anyone to ever find their submissions, then by all means don't take the 60 seconds it requires to give more than two descriptive tags to your music.
Pages