PS: Also, I would suggest to not permit cc-xx-2.0 licenses at all. If there's some art under that license around, it'd be better if the 'harvesters' would ask for new version permission.
So my take on this would be to have the following license selection.
The idea is, that selecting "[ ] open source use only" will js/auto-select ccbysa/gpl2/gpl3.
I think I have to agree with cenian, who told me on IRC that the liecnses should be hidden away more. If the 'advanced' option is one click away, I'd have no reason to complain. How about a "[ ] advanced view" checkbox, which will java-scriptley make all the exact licenses appear and disappear?
Also the 'newer licenses permitted' should beonly seen in 'advanced' mode. 'Yes' would be default.
Excellent! It looks soo nice! Nice spikes, detailed look. Full effort points for providing the equipment as a layer!
Steampunk Gentleman
Creativity: 50 Execution: 20 Effort: 35
Looks a bit bulky but super-inspirational. Much content/different items is a bonus Too bad not all items are complete.
Starsteel Barbarian Armor/Claws
Creativity: 30 Execution: 40 Effort: 40
I love the beard and I like the claws, the armor looks a bit like a backpack o_O.
Male Armor and Hair
Creativity: 25 Execution: 30 Effort: 40
Great hair, great armor look! The armor looks very strange in some of the special animations so no full effort points even though item is provided as layer sprite.
Top Hat - Lolhat
Creativity: 1 Execution: 1 Effort: 1
No creativity, idea taken from the TIGSource Gentleman "trend". It looks horrible and like the artist used MS paint.
Submitting audio leads to this message (might help debug the situation?):
warning: array_diff_assoc() [function.array-diff-assoc]: Argument #2 is not an array in /var/www/sites/opengameart/sites/all/modules/cck/includes/content.rules.inc on line 338.
I would prefer that. Just make it a subforum?
PS: Also, I would suggest to not permit cc-xx-2.0 licenses at all. If there's some art under that license around, it'd be better if the 'harvesters' would ask for new version permission.
So my take on this would be to have the following license selection.
The idea is, that selecting "[ ] open source use only" will js/auto-select ccbysa/gpl2/gpl3.
I think I have to agree with cenian, who told me on IRC that the liecnses should be hidden away more. If the 'advanced' option is one click away, I'd have no reason to complain. How about a "[ ] advanced view" checkbox, which will java-scriptley make all the exact licenses appear and disappear?
Also the 'newer licenses permitted' should beonly seen in 'advanced' mode. 'Yes' would be default.
I like the "how much is there" idea - it seems like seomthing that could be implemented rather easily
Brigand Armor
Creativity: 25 Execution: 50 Effort: 50
Excellent! It looks soo nice! Nice spikes, detailed look. Full effort points for providing the equipment as a layer!
Steampunk Gentleman
Creativity: 50 Execution: 20 Effort: 35
Looks a bit bulky but super-inspirational. Much content/different items is a bonus Too bad not all items are complete.
Starsteel Barbarian Armor/Claws
Creativity: 30 Execution: 40 Effort: 40
I love the beard and I like the claws, the armor looks a bit like a backpack o_O.
Male Armor and Hair
Creativity: 25 Execution: 30 Effort: 40
Great hair, great armor look! The armor looks very strange in some of the special animations so no full effort points even though item is provided as layer sprite.
Top Hat - Lolhat
Creativity: 1 Execution: 1 Effort: 1
No creativity, idea taken from the TIGSource Gentleman "trend". It looks horrible and like the artist used MS paint.
Turnip Armor
Creativity: 50 Execution: 50 Effort: 8
This would be so kick butt as a whole set! :D
It doesn't happen any more (maybe my gmail learned from me correcting it simply)
Submitting audio leads to this message (might help debug the situation?):
warning: array_diff_assoc() [function.array-diff-assoc]: Argument #2 is not an array in /var/www/sites/opengameart/sites/all/modules/cck/includes/content.rules.inc on line 338.
Needs moar hair ;)
This looks much better! (it's lighter now)
how to call it? (the style)
Pages