Skip to main content

User login

What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Register
  • Home
  • Browse
    • 2D Art
    • 3D Art
    • Concept Art
    • Textures
    • Music
    • Sound Effects
    • Documents
    • Featured Tutorials
  • Submit Art
  • Collect
    • My Collections
    • Art Collections
  • Forums
  • FAQ
  • Leaderboards
    • All Time
      • Total Points
      • Comments
      • Favorites (All)
      • Favorites (2D)
      • Favorites (3D)
      • Favorites (Concept Art)
      • Favorites (Music)
      • Favorites (Sound)
      • Favorites (Textures)
    • Weekly
      • Total Points
      • Comments
      • Favorites (All)
      • Favorites (2D)
      • Favorites (3D)
      • Favorites (Concept Art)
      • Favorites (Music)
      • Favorites (Sound)
      • Favorites (Textures)
  • ❤ Donate

Primary tabs

  • View
  • Collections
  • Comments(active tab)
  • Followers
  • Friends
  • Favorites
Wow. if the other continents
Monday, October 3, 2016 - 08:09

Wow. if the other continents are to scale, I can get the whole surface of the planet into a 36x36 pixel image! :)

@Ichabodh: cyanowl has
Monday, October 3, 2016 - 02:31

@Ichabodh: cyanowl has licensed these as CC0, already granting you permission to use the sprite templates for base models or anything else. :)

I can see nothing in Knife
Thursday, September 29, 2016 - 15:37

I can see nothing in Knife_drawer's posts to indicate a personal attack or sarcasm. As far as I can tell, he was essentially saying "no offense was intended" and yet offense has clearly been taken. I believe everyone posting here agrees that 1) it is a good song, and 2) the website's audio compression code was to blame for the preview's distortion.

Regardless of the intent of the message, name-calling and ad hominem attacks are not acceptable on OpenGameArt. If it looks like someone is being a jerk, everyone take a step back and check if it might be possible they aren't trying to be a jerk.

^Yeah, actually capbro's post
Thursday, September 29, 2016 - 13:44

^Yeah, actually capbro's post is more thourough and helpful than the FAQ link. I know I put a "TL;DR:" but in order to get a real answer to your question, you're going to have to do some reading.

TL;DR: yes, but additional
Thursday, September 29, 2016 - 13:21

TL;DR: yes, but additional action may be required depending on the license. 

Check out this FAQ entry: http://opengameart.org/content/faq#q-proprietary It covers the "additional action" that may be required for each license pretty well. Nothing too scary; just stuff like "credit the author and share the stuff you make with it" is the most strenuous thing you'd have to do to comply with the license, but a lot of the specifics depend on the details of your project. If that doesn't clear up your question, please do not hesitate to ask for more clarification by replying here. :)

Sorry about that. I usually
Sunday, September 25, 2016 - 12:04

@mbarde: I usually take notice if accounts that make comments, download art, or post on the forum. I must have assumed your account was abandoned since your participation only started today. 

Maybe I'm missing something,
Friday, September 23, 2016 - 20:21

Maybe I'm missing something, but the reason I haven't unlocked the file here yet is because the zip file still contains the FontStruct Non-Commercial Software End User License Agreement 1.0 in it. I can see some wording in the description was changed around the time when you posted about the licence being changed, but the zip file is the same as it was before.

Is it? The license.txt in the
Friday, September 23, 2016 - 15:29

Is it? The license.txt in the downloadable zip file still shows the "FontStruct Non-Commercial Software End User License Agreement 1.0" which is incompatible with the CC BY-SA license. Although the license is specifically for the use of the Font creation software and not for the use of the font itself (not that typefaces are protected by copyright in the U.S. to begin with), it is still confusing and appears to be directed at the use of the font itself.

Sorry. :/

Ah! Ok. Now I'm with you.
Wednesday, September 21, 2016 - 19:01

Ah! Ok. Now I'm with you. Cool. Well, the license page hasn't changed yet so niether has the licensing issue status. I'll try to keep an eye on it for updates. :)

...what?
Wednesday, September 21, 2016 - 18:45

...what?

Sorry, dannorder. I'm having some trouble following you. Does the site itself have an email? If so, I don't recieve any copies of the emails as a moderator. I check my private messages pretty regularly, and I recieve emails from the user contact form so those are usually pretty good methods of getting a mod's (my) attention. :)

I'm not sure if you're quoting "considering it" from the artist or another moderator, but I agree the license should be followed without modification, which is why I had to mark these submissions as having licensing issues until it is resolved. Craftpix.net contacted me privately to ask some questions about the license. I believe the misunderstanding was resolved and they decided to alter the licensing page soon.

Easy fix indeed. It was a misunderstanding of the nature of CC-By. I'm always available to answer questions people may have :)

Pages

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • …
  • 379
  • 380
  • 381
  • 382
  • 383
  • 384
  • 385
  • 386
  • 387
  • …
  • next ›
  • last »