@legopikmin: yes, based on the license selected, there are requirements to use this in a game. If you're not sure what a license requires of you, just click the license icon ( for example) to review the details of that license.
In this case, the license is CC BY-SA, so in summary, you're required to credit Skorpio in your game (a link back to this page is a good idea as well) indicate this asset is licensed CC BY-SA, and finally share any derivatives or new art you create based on this asset under the same license.
You should know the license you selected may allow others to sell the song, even by itself. I don't know why someone would buy it when you've been generous enough to give it to them for free here, but the restriction you mentioned "You can't sell the songs by themselves" may be unenforcable. The downloader must credit you and share all derivatives in the same manner, but I beleive they can also sell it. If they are respectful and polite, they won't do so because you've asked them not to.
The applies to the other songs you've submitted as well. I hope that doesn't discourage you from submitting more music. :)
The license you chose allows people to sell it, though. I don't know why anyone would buy it when they can get it here for free, but you should know the stipulation you specified about not allowed to sell it is unenforceable.
Perhaps, but spammer URLs everywhere else are easy to catch. Spammer URLs in the profile are less apparent. Spammers also tend not to contribute asssets, so any asset pages with spammy URLs on them get flagged pretty quickly. I can't speak to why altering your notification settings would reset your approval status; I'll let p0ss answer that one if he feels like it.
I suspect it is a simple mechanism that is not granular enough to detect specific aspects of profile changes. In which case, the only way to detect a spammer trying to change from a legit URL to a spammy URL once their account is approved is to default-unapprove the account whenever any profile change occurs. Definitely could use improvement, but at the moment it's a limitation of the framework, so it requires more than just a setting change to fix it, unfortunately.
Also, Account re-re-approved. :)
P.S. Don't wait days. message me right away or post like you did above immediately if you need account re-approval. Until this part is improved, there is no way for me to know your account has been unapproved. You'll just wait forever if you don't let me know. It won't bother me. :)
Currently this listing shows licenses CC BY 3.0 and CC0. This tells people they may choose either one for all assets in the set. I think these asssets need to be separated by licence and submitted separately. Otherwise this implies people may use all the assets in this zip file under CC0. (or CC BY, which is still not really true unless you relicense all the CC0 assets as CC BY 3.0.)
Welcome! I've used LÖVE some. :)
Excellent contribution. If you have any questions, just ask. Everyone's pretty willing to help out.
@Styno333: looks like the Voxel pack.
Is this character fan art of Ness?
@legopikmin: yes, based on the license selected, there are requirements to use this in a game. If you're not sure what a license requires of you, just click the license icon (
for example) to review the details of that license.
In this case, the license is CC BY-SA, so in summary, you're required to credit Skorpio in your game (a link back to this page is a good idea as well) indicate this asset is licensed CC BY-SA, and finally share any derivatives or new art you create based on this asset under the same license.
Other assets on OGA may have other licenses, but none of the licenses forbid you from using them in a commercial game. See also http://opengameart.org/content/faq#q-proprietary.
Great song!
You should know the license you selected may allow others to sell the song, even by itself. I don't know why someone would buy it when you've been generous enough to give it to them for free here, but the restriction you mentioned "You can't sell the songs by themselves" may be unenforcable. The downloader must credit you and share all derivatives in the same manner, but I beleive they can also sell it. If they are respectful and polite, they won't do so because you've asked them not to.
The applies to the other songs you've submitted as well. I hope that doesn't discourage you from submitting more music. :)
Nice boxes.
The license you chose allows people to sell it, though. I don't know why anyone would buy it when they can get it here for free, but you should know the stipulation you specified about not allowed to sell it is unenforceable.
Perhaps, but spammer URLs everywhere else are easy to catch. Spammer URLs in the profile are less apparent. Spammers also tend not to contribute asssets, so any asset pages with spammy URLs on them get flagged pretty quickly. I can't speak to why altering your notification settings would reset your approval status; I'll let p0ss answer that one if he feels like it.
I suspect it is a simple mechanism that is not granular enough to detect specific aspects of profile changes. In which case, the only way to detect a spammer trying to change from a legit URL to a spammy URL once their account is approved is to default-unapprove the account whenever any profile change occurs. Definitely could use improvement, but at the moment it's a limitation of the framework, so it requires more than just a setting change to fix it, unfortunately.
Also, Account re-re-approved. :)
P.S. Don't wait days. message me right away or post like you did above immediately if you need account re-approval. Until this part is improved, there is no way for me to know your account has been unapproved. You'll just wait forever if you don't let me know. It won't bother me. :)
Cool. Thanks for submitting these.
Groovy. Thanks for your willingness to resolve this so quickly.
Nice assets!
Currently this listing shows licenses CC BY 3.0 and CC0. This tells people they may choose either one for all assets in the set. I think these asssets need to be separated by licence and submitted separately. Otherwise this implies people may use all the assets in this zip file under CC0. (or CC BY, which is still not really true unless you relicense all the CC0 assets as CC BY 3.0.)
Pages