Understood and agreed. If those people are not crediting you and not linking back to the page they got your assets from, they're breaking the terms of the license. Either those people need to get in trouble for breaking the terms of CC-BY* or they aren't going to be deterred by saying "no resale" anyway.
CC-BY-SA is the one that best matches your conditions, it just doesn't allow that condition to be added; it'll be pretty hard for anyone to resell them as is.
If you're insisting on keeping that stipulation, then none of them fit: forbidding resale crates a lot of unintended legal problems, even for non commercial projects, so any such EULAs are not accepted on OGA. If the concern is related to reselling under exclusive terms, like NFTs, that's already illegal under CC-BY-SA without the need for the extra stipulation.
FYI, CC-BY-SA allows people to try* reselling the assets as is, so the stipulation about "don't resell" really should not be included.
*They can try, but they probably won't be successful since anyone who would resell these can be required to link back to this page. Any potential customers would see that the assets are free and not bother to pay for them. Also, there's this, too as far as NFTs go, or anyone implying free assets can only be obtained via purchase.
Sorry, I wasn't clear: It should say either Creative Commons 0, or CC0, but not Creative Commons Attribution. the "attribution" part makes it a different license.
However, the licenses you indicate in the description and readme.txt (CC-BY international 1.0) doesn't match the license you selected for this submission (CC0)
In fact, OGA doesn't even support version 1 of the CC-BY license. It is very out-of-date. Well, there is no such thing as CC-BY international 1.0, actual, since the international compatibility didn't exist until version 4.0.
Would you be willing to either change the license on the submission to CC-BY 4.0 or change the license referenced in the readme and description to CC0?
As it is now, the licensing is confusing, so I must mark this as having a licensing issue. Let me know if you have any questions.
Wow, nice.
What are these from?
reported.
Nice,
but, again, "Creative Commons Attribution 0" is not an actual license. There isCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC-BY 3.0),Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0), orCreative Commons 0 (CC0), but there is no such thing asCreative Commons Attribution 0nor is there any such thing asCreative Commons Attribution 1.0 InternationalEDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Understood and agreed. If those people are not crediting you and not linking back to the page they got your assets from, they're breaking the terms of the license. Either those people need to get in trouble for breaking the terms of CC-BY* or they aren't going to be deterred by saying "no resale" anyway.
CC-BY-SA is the one that best matches your conditions, it just doesn't allow that condition to be added; it'll be pretty hard for anyone to resell them as is.
If you're insisting on keeping that stipulation, then none of them fit: forbidding resale crates a lot of unintended legal problems, even for non commercial projects, so any such EULAs are not accepted on OGA. If the concern is related to reselling under exclusive terms, like NFTs, that's already illegal under CC-BY-SA without the need for the extra stipulation.Beautiful!
FYI, CC-BY-SA allows people to try* reselling the assets as is, so the stipulation about "don't resell" really should not be included.*They can try, but they probably won't be successful since anyone who would resell these can be required to link back to this page. Any potential customers would see that the assets are free and not bother to pay for them. Also, there's this, too as far as NFTs go, or anyone implying free assets can only be obtained via purchase.Sorry, I wasn't clear: It should say either Creative Commons 0, or CC0, but not Creative Commons Attribution. the "attribution" part makes it a different license.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Yes. Changing it to either one works: Creative Commons 0 or CC0EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Neat.
However, the licenses you indicate in the description and readme.txt (CC-BY international 1.0) doesn't match the license you selected for this submission (CC0)In fact, OGA doesn't even support version 1 of the CC-BY license. It is very out-of-date. Well, there is no such thing as CC-BY international 1.0, actual, since the international compatibility didn't exist until version 4.0.Would you be willing to either change the license on the submission to CC-BY 4.0 or change the license referenced in the readme and description to CC0?As it is now, the licensing is confusing, so I must mark this as having a licensing issue. Let me know if you have any questions.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
This is more of a "show-off-your-project" topic.
[topic moved]
Pages