Ah, yes. I've seen this glitch before. It's pretty rare, but the best I can figure is the site tries to find an alias for the file name and ends up using one that was already aliased. It is no surprise that a lot of people name thier preview "ambience.mp3". The site tries to retain the original file name for every submisison, but it also has to be able to distinguish the multitude of "ambiences" from one another. Very rarely, it thinks that ambience_1 alias is unused and links to an unrelated ambience_1 alias. I have renamed this preview as VL2M_ambience.mp3. Let me know if anyone still hears the wrong track.
P.S. Yes, y'all should tell me about this weird stuff. :) I only happened across this by chance. The spam flag is not a bad way to alert me, but it only works if you make a comment about why you're using it at the time. Otherwise, I see the spam flag, check submission, see nothing apparently wrong, and move on.
That's a pretty cool generator. However, the asset you're sharing here on OGA is not the generator. It would need to be a few samples of what the generator can create. The problem is, that screenshot is not a usable asset. The preview image is fine, but would you be willing to change that "screenshot.png" in the File(s) section to a few examples of swords in a form that someone could use in their game?
Here on OGA? None of them, I'm afraid. Many forbid implying your endorsement or approval, but none forbid printing and advertising. Would you be willing to allow that possibility so these assets can stay here?
That... is not permitted here. I appreciate the clarification, but the assets of a submission must be compatible with the listed license in their entirety. If there are parts of the submission that do not fall under the license(s) listed, those parts must be submitted separately under that other license.
If you're not clear on which assets fall under CC-BY-SA and not GPL, then none of the unclear assets should be included.
If, on the other hand, you're saying every asset can be under the GPL, but only some of them are also under CC-BY-SA as well, then you must only list the license(s) common to all assets. In such case, this submission would be just GPL since not all the assets are dual-licensed as both GPL and CC-BY-SA.
When you say "Art is either GPLv3 or CC-BY-SA" are you saying all these textures can be GPL if I wanted... or they could all be CC-BY-SA if I so choose?
Or is it that any given texture in this pack is one of the two?
Oh, nice! I think that will suffice. Thank you, buttons!
Any plans for a closed version of this book? I would love to have a blank cover to go with this open book!
Ah, yes. I've seen this glitch before. It's pretty rare, but the best I can figure is the site tries to find an alias for the file name and ends up using one that was already aliased. It is no surprise that a lot of people name thier preview "ambience.mp3". The site tries to retain the original file name for every submisison, but it also has to be able to distinguish the multitude of "ambiences" from one another. Very rarely, it thinks that ambience_1 alias is unused and links to an unrelated ambience_1 alias. I have renamed this preview as VL2M_ambience.mp3. Let me know if anyone still hears the wrong track.
P.S. Yes, y'all should tell me about this weird stuff. :) I only happened across this by chance. The spam flag is not a bad way to alert me, but it only works if you make a comment about why you're using it at the time. Otherwise, I see the spam flag, check submission, see nothing apparently wrong, and move on.
👍
Neat!
Can you list that source information in the Copyright/Attribution Notice section as well?That's a pretty cool generator.
However, the asset you're sharing here on OGA is not the generator. It would need to be a few samples of what the generator can create. The problem is, that screenshot is not a usable asset. The preview image is fine, but would you be willing to change that "screenshot.png" in the File(s) section to a few examples of swords in a form that someone could use in their game?Here on OGA? None of them, I'm afraid. Many forbid implying your endorsement or approval, but none forbid printing and advertising.
Would you be willing to allow that possibility so these assets can stay here?EDIT: Fixed, thanks!
Groovy. Looks good. Thanks!
That... is not permitted here. I appreciate the clarification, but the assets of a submission must be compatible with the listed license in their entirety. If there are parts of the submission that do not fall under the license(s) listed, those parts must be submitted separately under that other license.
If you're not clear on which assets fall under CC-BY-SA and not GPL, then none of the unclear assets should be included.
If, on the other hand, you're saying every asset can be under the GPL, but only some of them are also under CC-BY-SA as well, then you must only list the license(s) common to all assets. In such case, this submission would be just GPL since not all the assets are dual-licensed as both GPL and CC-BY-SA.
When you say "Art is either GPLv3 or CC-BY-SA" are you saying all these textures can be GPL if I wanted... or they could all be CC-BY-SA if I so choose?
Or is it that any given texture in this pack is one of the two?
Pages