Strictly speaking, these are not vector graphics. They're raster. That's fine, but if they're based on vector, do you have those vector files you'd be willing to share as well? It doubles their usefulness when people can use the .png or the .svg. Thanks again for sharing.
"... unauthorized use, reproduction, or distribution ... is strictly prohibited. All rights reserved."
Is in conflict with the licenses you've chosen. By sharing this art under the CC-BY or GPL license, you are giving everyone "the artist's permission" to redistribute and reproduce it, and you are authorizing people to use it in almost any way they want so long as they give you credit. They are not required to ask your permission because you are giving it by default. Sharing it here means all rights are NOT reserved. You are waiving most of them. Some rights reserved. Are you ok with that?
Putting both here implies the entire set can be either CC0 or CC-BY 3.0. That isn't the case. The implication from the new attribution is that the set is CC0 in part and alsoCC-BY in part. It is true that your parts can be CC0 and Buch's parts can be CC-BY, but listing both licenses isn't the way to specify diffrent licenses for subcomponents. Only licenses common to all parts may be listed.
P.S. The attribution blurb can remain as it is. Those users wishing to suss out which parts are CC0 and use those separately may do so, but the submission has to indicate accurate licensing for the submission as a whole.
Great.
Strictly speaking, these are not vector graphics. They're raster. That's fine, but if they're based on vector, do you have those vector files you'd be willing to share as well? It doubles their usefulness when people can use the .png or the .svg. Thanks again for sharing.
Looks good. Thanks. Let us know if you have any questions about the licenses or their implications. We're always happy to help.
Cool!
However, the claim:Is in conflict with the licenses you've chosen. By sharing this art under the CC-BY or GPL license, you are giving everyone "the artist's permission" to redistribute and reproduce it, and you are authorizing people to use it in almost any way they want so long as they give you credit. They are not required to ask your permission because you are giving it by default. Sharing it here means all rights are NOT reserved. You are waiving most of them. Some rights reserved. Are you ok with that?EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
As sus as he is, he's right. Another banger.
Assets used for any Jetpack related work.
It is. Thank you.
Putting both here implies the entire set can be either CC0 or CC-BY 3.0. That isn't the case. The implication from the new attribution is that the set is CC0 in part and also CC-BY in part.It is true that your parts can be CC0 and Buch's parts can be CC-BY,but listing both licenses isn't the way to specify diffrent licenses for subcomponents. Only licenses common to all parts may be listed.P.S. The attribution blurb can remain as it is. Those users wishing to suss out which parts are CC0 and use those separately may do so,
but the submission has to indicate accurate licensing for the submission as a whole.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
The license cannot be CC0 when the original is CC-BY.Thank you for fixing the attribution.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
@SirFalcon: everything on this site can be used in game jams.
See FAQ entry #1
Are you able to add the "lower" poly barrel to this submission as well?
Pages