You can upload it, but it will still be download-disabled for now. You would definitely own the copyright to the initial photo, but the training dataset used by the AI is still questionable.
"Submissions will be unaffected by any such removal if the art therein was generated with technologies who's training dataset, in its entirety, is demonstrably openly licensed."
Are you able to show the technolgy's training dataset, in its entirety, is openly licensed?
I think the simplicity of these concentric circles may qualify as trivial. It would likely take the average user less time to create a comparable asset themselves rather than search OGA and download it from here, unfortunately.
Scroll below the image on loc.gov to the section labelled "Cite this item". Copy any one of the citation styles into the copyright/attribution notice section.
Not a bother at all. Thanks for asking these questions. The discussion helps us all.
You can upload it, but it will still be download-disabled for now. You would definitely own the copyright to the initial photo, but the training dataset used by the AI is still questionable.
Are you able to show the technolgy's training dataset, in its entirety, is openly licensed?
Nice! Did you make all of these?
Hey! I'm trying to sacrifice a dude! Get your papers outta here, my occult lair isn't your office.
LOL
bumped for new content
I think the simplicity of these concentric circles may qualify as trivial. It would likely take the average user less time to create a comparable asset themselves rather than search OGA and download it from here, unfortunately.EDIT: Nice! Fixed, thanks! :)
As another practical example, GabrielTurner uses AI to comment on AI discussions :P
Thanks.
...Wait, did I actually use the exact image in my example?
Scroll below the image on loc.gov to the section labelled "Cite this item". Copy any one of the citation styles into the copyright/attribution notice section.
Pages