This submission has been marked as having a potential licensing issue. Hopefully, this is temporary. This does not mean the submitter has done anything wrong or that there is even a licensing issue at all, but there is a potential licensing issue. As mentioned previously in various places on OGA, we said
"...Until that broader discussion [of the legality of AI assisted artwork] progresses closer to some form of conclusion, we'll go with the general consensus. ... [the] general precedent [is currently] that it's fine. If that general consensus changes, so will the decision to host such assets on OGA."
The general consensus is changing now. Changing to what is not yet clear, but there are several ongoing US court cases involving exactly this topic. The court's decision on these cases will inform how OGA hosts assets created with the use of AI assistance. See https://opengameart.org/content/artificial-intelligence-assisted-artwork for more information. Resolution of this licensing issue flag can be accelerated by adding details to the description regarding which Generative AI tools were used, including links to licensing/EULA/technical informaiton.
This is NOT any sort of final determination or a permanent flagging of this submission. Regardless of the court's decisions about these tools, there are a lot of factors to take into consideration. Not all submissions will be handled the same way.
@mrhealthpatriot: are you involved with dpx's project in some way? It looks like you're seeking talent resources, as dpx is, but if your project has nothing to do with dpx's, this should probably be posted on it's own thread.
Remarkable! My mistake; they look exactly like 3D polygonal flowers. How do you achieve that effect with just 2D painting? They're lovely.
Procreate uses 3D models. Did you create the 3D flowers or did they come with procreate or did they come from somewhere else?
How did you make these if there are no 3D models for them?
These look lik prerendered 3d models. Do you have the 3D models themselves?
Cool.
Do you have a link to the original by Simon Thommes?
@phaelax: ?? Looks the same to me. Has transparency, even. What are you using to open the file?
This submission has been marked as having a potential licensing issue. Hopefully, this is temporary. This does not mean the submitter has done anything wrong or that there is even a licensing issue at all, but there is a potential licensing issue. As mentioned previously in various places on OGA, we said
The general consensus is changing now. Changing to what is not yet clear, but there are several ongoing US court cases involving exactly this topic. The court's decision on these cases will inform how OGA hosts assets created with the use of AI assistance. See https://opengameart.org/content/artificial-intelligence-assisted-artwork for more information. Resolution of this licensing issue flag can be accelerated by adding details to the description regarding which Generative AI tools were used, including links to licensing/EULA/technical informaiton.
This is NOT any sort of final determination or a permanent flagging of this submission. Regardless of the court's decisions about these tools, there are a lot of factors to take into consideration. Not all submissions will be handled the same way.
Looks nice.
Are these AI generated as well?
Some look like they're from vector graphics, others look like they're from photos.
Where are these all from?
I mean, I'm guessing all clipart, but are they all from the same clipart site?
@mrhealthpatriot: are you involved with dpx's project in some way? It looks like you're seeking talent resources, as dpx is, but if your project has nothing to do with dpx's, this should probably be posted on it's own thread.
Pages