I stuck together some gifs to show off his animations.
Same license as the original (currently CC-BY-SA 4.0 / GPL 3.0). Kelvin Shadewing is the author of this guy and should be attributed in any uses of these.
If you lose 1 pixel from 'Q' and 'x', neither of which really need it (or at least, in the case of 'x', it doesn't help much), then all the letters can fit in 3x4.
It looks as though OGA already does everything he recommends. An "I agree to auto-upgrade to newer versions of the license" text is right there in the submissions form. I don't know how long it's been there, but if it was there on day 1, then I guess everything on the site could be bumped from CC-BY 3.0 to CC-BY 4.0 at the click of a mouse.
Although, I wonder if sometime there might arise a reason to downgrade a license version or even substitute a whole license. E.g. a new version of a CC licence is released but it has an unfortunate "bug"; or a maliciously crafted licence is released and nobody spots it until it achieves high takeup. "Newer is not always better"... However I guess that would be a much more difficult situation than just bumping a license to a newer version of the same license.
That's a really nice piece of work!
Is that QR code scannable?
Nice!
I stuck together some gifs to show off his animations.
Same license as the original (currently CC-BY-SA 4.0 / GPL 3.0). Kelvin Shadewing is the author of this guy and should be attributed in any uses of these.
That is a very cute-yet-menacing yeti!
I just noticed that the license text file in the zip describes CC0, but this is not submitted as CC0.
It's very pretty and efficient, though!
He's cool! Nice animation.
'+'/'t' and '*'/'X' similarly indistinguishable.
If you lose 1 pixel from 'Q' and 'x', neither of which really need it (or at least, in the case of 'x', it doesn't help much), then all the letters can fit in 3x4.
Interesting!
'2'/'Z' and '5'/'S' are indistinguishable. 'k' is a bit of a problem, as is 'x'. 'z' can be done better as the horizontal flip of 's'.
It looks as though OGA already does everything he recommends. An "I agree to auto-upgrade to newer versions of the license" text is right there in the submissions form. I don't know how long it's been there, but if it was there on day 1, then I guess everything on the site could be bumped from CC-BY 3.0 to CC-BY 4.0 at the click of a mouse.
Although, I wonder if sometime there might arise a reason to downgrade a license version or even substitute a whole license. E.g. a new version of a CC licence is released but it has an unfortunate "bug"; or a maliciously crafted licence is released and nobody spots it until it achieves high takeup. "Newer is not always better"... However I guess that would be a much more difficult situation than just bumping a license to a newer version of the same license.
I recommend adding previews of all the images, some of those are pretty cool.
Pages