Very cool, thanks for CC0 :) Looks very similar to my game Anarch, I think the assets could be interswapped between the games as an experiment, might be interesting.
Nice parable, I don't think it would be good for me to comment on it here. (My views on censorship in name of "privacy" are available a few links away) Well, if you allow to host proprietary art you will get even more art hosted here -- most people don't share their art here out of fear of sharing it under a free license. I would say let's just not host art of artists who are afraid of setting their art free. As an user of OGA art I would rather prefer to not even be in danger of downloading art of someone who wants to keep the priviledge of retroactively taking down the art -- these are the kinds of people who have a higher probability of starting to make trouble, despite free license. I would rather have fewer submissions on this site that are by people who mean it. Anyway I don't think I will convice you of changing the rules or even your mind, no one on the Internet can be convinced about anything, I think it's even a named rule of something. I just feel obliged to leave my disagreement here, it's good to have it recorded and visible. We may leave this at agree to disagree :) Also let me say I still love OGA, thank you for running it <3
Yeah well this is diving into another topic, I'll just say that I think the point of free culture is that it is always ethical for anyone to reshare anyone else's work, even against the author's will, and it is always unethical to prevent anyone from resharing any work. I don't believe any resharing can ever be unethical, it can only be illegal.
That's all pretty fair, I just find the OGA rule for not hosting files against the author's will kind of anti free-culture. Of course, OGA may legally impose such a rule, just as it is legal to create proprietary software for example, but it's a rule against free culture spirit directly violating one of the four essential freedoms, specifically anyone's right to redistribute art. If an author decides to use a free license, he chooses to give up the right to decide who and where can redistribute this art, and OGA reinstates this right (even if just in its own territory), taking a step back towards permission culture. I don't believe there is malicious intent behind that rule, but in my opinion it doesn't consider the in-depth consequences and it doesn't fit at all here. Just saying, I'd be glad if that rule could perhap be discussed and reconsidered.
Both are incredibly high poly, the lines on the handle are completely modelled out.
I love this, thank you for sharing!
This is low poly?
Very nice! Thank you.
Paypal donation no longer works? :/
Awesome, I love these, thanks :) BTW those low poly effects are called Gouraud and flat shading.
Very cool, thanks for CC0 :) Looks very similar to my game Anarch, I think the assets could be interswapped between the games as an experiment, might be interesting.
Nice parable, I don't think it would be good for me to comment on it here. (My views on censorship in name of "privacy" are available a few links away) Well, if you allow to host proprietary art you will get even more art hosted here -- most people don't share their art here out of fear of sharing it under a free license. I would say let's just not host art of artists who are afraid of setting their art free. As an user of OGA art I would rather prefer to not even be in danger of downloading art of someone who wants to keep the priviledge of retroactively taking down the art -- these are the kinds of people who have a higher probability of starting to make trouble, despite free license. I would rather have fewer submissions on this site that are by people who mean it. Anyway I don't think I will convice you of changing the rules or even your mind, no one on the Internet can be convinced about anything, I think it's even a named rule of something. I just feel obliged to leave my disagreement here, it's good to have it recorded and visible. We may leave this at agree to disagree :) Also let me say I still love OGA, thank you for running it <3
Yeah well this is diving into another topic, I'll just say that I think the point of free culture is that it is always ethical for anyone to reshare anyone else's work, even against the author's will, and it is always unethical to prevent anyone from resharing any work. I don't believe any resharing can ever be unethical, it can only be illegal.
That's all pretty fair, I just find the OGA rule for not hosting files against the author's will kind of anti free-culture. Of course, OGA may legally impose such a rule, just as it is legal to create proprietary software for example, but it's a rule against free culture spirit directly violating one of the four essential freedoms, specifically anyone's right to redistribute art. If an author decides to use a free license, he chooses to give up the right to decide who and where can redistribute this art, and OGA reinstates this right (even if just in its own territory), taking a step back towards permission culture. I don't believe there is malicious intent behind that rule, but in my opinion it doesn't consider the in-depth consequences and it doesn't fit at all here. Just saying, I'd be glad if that rule could perhap be discussed and reconsidered.
Pages