Fair enough, what I'm trying to say is that if something like https://www.moma.org/collection/works/79816 is considered artistic expression (i.e. copyrightable) despite being extremely abstract and due to the fact the colors are ordered (any list is) and arranged in a grid, someone could argue the preview picture here (which I understand to be a straightforward visualization of the palette) might be considered an abstract art as well, even despite the opinion of the original author. Honestly though my doubt is probably unreasonably paranoid.
AFAIK copyright status of palettes is debatable and may depend on country etc. My understanding is that a small SET of colors can usually not be copyrighted, but a specific ordering of the colors can -- consider that an arrangement of colors can be seen as abstract painting for example. Many such paintings consist just of a few colored squares arranged in specific ways. Now this is a grey area but I just wouldn't be completely sure here.
*so, sorry for typo. Also one small request: Could you please also include plain .obj (or collada) exports? It's a universal format and as much as Blender is popular, not everyone is using it, some older computers can't even run the new versions. Anyway these are amazing, I can't wait for more of your animals.
Great topo and appropriate polygon count, very good work. Are you also planning non-human models after this? Would be cool to see some animals or fantasy creatures modelled with your skills :)
It's extremely cool to see "real" low poly models here, so many of them and very well made too. I'm just not sure how copyright-safe it is to copy exact car models, but still anyone can easily change the vehicles slightly to something more generic and then it's completely fine, so great job, I truly love to see this.
True, I feel the same, no drama intended, I'd also hate to go much deeper on this. My impression was, and please correct me if I am wrong, that the rules that are in place ARE indeed mostly based in ethical beliefs but at least some of them are (again, as I perceive it) of practical nature, aimed at keeping this website a peaceful place, which in my book is absolutely fine, but let's just say so. It's an admirable deed to run a website like this already and there's nothing wrong in wanting drama out of course.
Thank you, I feel the same about AI ^_^
Fair enough, what I'm trying to say is that if something like https://www.moma.org/collection/works/79816 is considered artistic expression (i.e. copyrightable) despite being extremely abstract and due to the fact the colors are ordered (any list is) and arranged in a grid, someone could argue the preview picture here (which I understand to be a straightforward visualization of the palette) might be considered an abstract art as well, even despite the opinion of the original author. Honestly though my doubt is probably unreasonably paranoid.
AFAIK copyright status of palettes is debatable and may depend on country etc. My understanding is that a small SET of colors can usually not be copyrighted, but a specific ordering of the colors can -- consider that an arrangement of colors can be seen as abstract painting for example. Many such paintings consist just of a few colored squares arranged in specific ways. Now this is a grey area but I just wouldn't be completely sure here.
Made my day, there are many tiny bitmap fonts under CC0 but almost none true vector fonts, this is an awesome contribution.
*so, sorry for typo. Also one small request: Could you please also include plain .obj (or collada) exports? It's a universal format and as much as Blender is popular, not everyone is using it, some older computers can't even run the new versions. Anyway these are amazing, I can't wait for more of your animals.
Thank you some much, these are perfect :)
Great topo and appropriate polygon count, very good work. Are you also planning non-human models after this? Would be cool to see some animals or fantasy creatures modelled with your skills :)
Very nice houses, thank you for sharing :-)
It's extremely cool to see "real" low poly models here, so many of them and very well made too. I'm just not sure how copyright-safe it is to copy exact car models, but still anyone can easily change the vehicles slightly to something more generic and then it's completely fine, so great job, I truly love to see this.
True, I feel the same, no drama intended, I'd also hate to go much deeper on this. My impression was, and please correct me if I am wrong, that the rules that are in place ARE indeed mostly based in ethical beliefs but at least some of them are (again, as I perceive it) of practical nature, aimed at keeping this website a peaceful place, which in my book is absolutely fine, but let's just say so. It's an admirable deed to run a website like this already and there's nothing wrong in wanting drama out of course.
Pages