Thanks, but just FYI, the attribution should, at a minimum, link to this page specifically.
(Linking to RubberDuck's profile is fine, but less important than linking to the specific asset itself given that author information is available here, but asset information is not as available from rubberduck's profile.)
The license selected (CC-BY 3.0) conflicts with the license indicated inside the readme.txt (CC-BY-SA 1.0). Would you be willing to edit the readme.txt to match the license indicated above on the left? Until then, I must mark this as having a licensing issue.
The license selected (CC-BY 4.0) conflicts with the license indicated inside the readme.txt (CC-BY-SA 1.0). Would you be willing to edit the readme.txt to match the license indicated above on the left? Until then, I must mark this as having a licensing issue.
The license selected (CC-BY 3.0) conflicts with the license indicated inside the readme.txt (CC-BY-SA 1.0). Would you be willing to edit the readme.txt to match the license indicated above on the left? Until then, I must mark this as having a licensing issue.
The license selected (CC-BY 3.0) conflicts with the license indicated inside the readme.txt (CC-BY-SA 1.0). Would you be willing to edit the readme.txt to match the license indicated above on the left? Until then, I must mark this as having a licensing issue.
The license selected (CC-BY 3.0) conflicts with the license indicated inside the readme.txt (CC-BY-SA 1.0). Would you be willing to edit the readme.txt to match the license indicated above on the left? Until then, I must mark this as having a licensing issue.
D'oh! Missed the "here". Disregard, you have it right. Thanks again.
P.S. @heruca: MapForge looks fantastic. Already signed up. Are you a stakeholder in the software itself as well as an art pack contributor?
Thanks,
but just FYI, the attribution should, at a minimum, link to this page specifically.(Linking to RubberDuck's profile is fine, but less important than linking to the specific asset itself given that author information is available here, but asset information is not as available from rubberduck's profile.)@hruca: Where is the attribution for the free content Add-On?
Nice. What inspired this song?
The license selected (CC-BY 3.0) conflicts with the license indicated inside the readme.txt (CC-BY-SA 1.0). Would you be willing to edit the readme.txt to match the license indicated above on the left? Until then, I must mark this as having a licensing issue.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
The license selected (CC-BY 4.0) conflicts with the license indicated inside the readme.txt (CC-BY-SA 1.0). Would you be willing to edit the readme.txt to match the license indicated above on the left? Until then, I must mark this as having a licensing issue.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
The license selected (CC-BY 3.0) conflicts with the license indicated inside the readme.txt (CC-BY-SA 1.0). Would you be willing to edit the readme.txt to match the license indicated above on the left? Until then, I must mark this as having a licensing issue.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
The license selected (CC-BY 3.0) conflicts with the license indicated inside the readme.txt (CC-BY-SA 1.0). Would you be willing to edit the readme.txt to match the license indicated above on the left? Until then, I must mark this as having a licensing issue.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
The license selected (CC-BY 3.0) conflicts with the license indicated inside the readme.txt (CC-BY-SA 1.0). Would you be willing to edit the readme.txt to match the license indicated above on the left? Until then, I must mark this as having a licensing issue.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Pages