I did see that "you are accountable" blurb in Stable Diffusion's TOS, but it seems like a (albeit weak) attempt at disclaiming accoutability for IP issues. Kind of like people who put no copyright infringement intended in a video featuring a bunch of copyrighted/trademarked stuff.
Realistically it is saying 'it is possible for you, the user of Stable Diffusion, to get trademarked/copyrighted/illegal outputs. It is your (the user's) responsibility to use your output within the bounds of the law.' Not because Stable Diffusion tends to produce copyright infringing content, but because you can prompt it to produce Mikey Mouse, or Super Mario, or a WotC' s Beholder.
EDIT: woops! looks like we had hashed this out already in the thread you linked to. I'll leave it to speak for itself... yourself... ourselves?
MIT also requires a copy of the license text to be included. The concern is the uploader may not be the author, and the author may insist on that stipulation. Also not sure what "bot world schmot world" means.
All licenses on OGA allow for the stipulations you've forbidden. Would you be willing to forego those restrictions? Untill then I must mark this as having a licensing issue to prevent usage you may not approve of.
The same way you decode your titles, of course! :P
"Medicine Storm's Response # 0001"
MSR0001!
I did see that "you are accountable" blurb in Stable Diffusion's TOS, but it seems like a (albeit weak) attempt at disclaiming accoutability for IP issues. Kind of like people who put no copyright infringement intended in a video featuring a bunch of copyrighted/trademarked stuff.
Realistically it is saying 'it is possible for you, the user of Stable Diffusion, to get trademarked/copyrighted/illegal outputs. It is your (the user's) responsibility to use your output within the bounds of the law.' Not because Stable Diffusion tends to produce copyright infringing content, but because you can prompt it to produce Mikey Mouse, or Super Mario, or a WotC' s Beholder.
EDIT: woops! looks like we had hashed this out already in the thread you linked to. I'll leave it to speak for itself... yourself... ourselves?
MIT also requires a copy of the license text to be included. The concern is the uploader may not be the author, and the author may insist on that stipulation. Also not sure what "bot world schmot world" means.
Can you explain more about what you are saying in the copyright/attribution notice section, please? I don't understand.
Hehehe. I wonder if this very thread has become a component of ChatGPT's training set. Or the Collection discussion that Emcee Flesher mentioned: https://opengameart.org/content/artificial-intelligence-assisted-artwork
nostalgia indeed! Have these been in a game before? I swear I've played something with these.
Thanks. Fixed...ish.
All licenses on OGA allow for the stipulations you've forbidden. Would you be willing to forego those restrictions? Untill then I must mark this as having a licensing issue to prevent usage you may not approve of.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
I do, thank you.
Pages