Although "distinctiveness" is often diminished at this resolution, I believe this spritesheet is still distinct from the inspiration source. There is no indications of copyright- nor trademark- violations.
I remember that show. Thank you for sharing @luckygreentiger, and thank you @RadThadd for being on the lookout.
Yes. They are each very different. Well, CC-By and GPL are very different, but there is also a reason for version 2 and version 3 to be listed on this asset.
GPL makes it easy to use this audio in your project if your project already uses GPL content.
CC-BY makes it easy for you to use it in your project if your project uses anything other than GPL content.
That should be fine. So long as the models don't use any existing trademarks (you have been making your own brands, so this should not be an issue) nor explicit verbiage or imagry (real-life sexual well-being products use only medical terminology and have no explicit imagry on the packages as far as I know, so I assume you will be mimicing this practice as well, and therefore should not be an issue)
EDIT: Actually, I have seen some condom packages with rather racey iimagery on them. I would recommend avoiding this style of provocative sexual imagery on the products. To be clear, condom packages etc should be fine, so long as they are the medical/neutral style.
Are you "fmoriera"?
Although "distinctiveness" is often diminished at this resolution, I believe this spritesheet is still distinct from the inspiration source. There is no indications of copyright- nor trademark- violations.
I remember that show. Thank you for sharing @luckygreentiger, and thank you @RadThadd for being on the lookout.
Yes. They are each very different. Well, CC-By and GPL are very different, but there is also a reason for version 2 and version 3 to be listed on this asset.
GPL makes it easy to use this audio in your project if your project already uses GPL content.
CC-BY makes it easy for you to use it in your project if your project uses anything other than GPL content.
See FAQ "What do the licenses mean" and "Some artists have multiple licenses listed..."
Please start attributing your textures in accordance with site submission guidelines.
LOL!
Nicely done! I love fantasy icons and I love vector icons.
Don't forget to list Clint in your copyright/attribution section. Something like:
OMG these brand names are hilarious. "No-BB", "Lilith" brand birth control complete with black moon lilith symbol ⚸
I love it.
@ArtChitect: can you tell us more about how the texture for this was made?
That should be fine. So long as the models don't use any existing trademarks (you have been making your own brands, so this should not be an issue) nor explicit verbiage or imagry (real-life sexual well-being products use only medical terminology and have no explicit imagry on the packages as far as I know, so I assume you will be mimicing this practice as well, and therefore should not be an issue)
EDIT: Actually, I have seen some condom packages with rather racey iimagery on them. I would recommend avoiding this style of provocative sexual imagery on the products. To be clear, condom packages etc should be fine, so long as they are the medical/neutral style.
Excellent model.
Where did the texture come from? Or is that hand painted?
Pages