Ah, yes. ANY ONE of the three, not all three at once. Though please do list all 3 licenses in your credits so other people know they also have that same choice.
@slade_38012: If you don't understand GPL, I recommend choosing one of the other two licenses. Namely, CC-BY 4.0, which is easier to understand, IMHO.
Click on any license tile (like for example) for more information about it.
Under the terms of CC-BY 4.0 you are indeed allowed to modify the image and use it in your game/youtube-video/t-shirt printing business/whatever, commercially or non-commercially, so long as you give proper credit to SCay. Check out the FAQ for one good way to give credit: https://opengameart.org/content/faq#q-how-to-credit. For instance, add the following text to your credits page or credits screen:
Other submissions are too recent for archive.org to have a snapshot, but the only other one with a license change shows you made two revisions, one where you note changing the license from "the wrong license; CC-BY-3.0" to something else (Site logs show it already had CC-BY-SA, but you added CC-BY as well) and another where you change the license again; "removed SA license" (instead of both CC-BY and CC-BY-SA, you removed the -SA and left just the CC-BY) so the total timeline of licenses on it is:
I should also note there is no mechanism for the site to change licenses on its own. Both you and administrators could change the license, but there is no way to do so without the revision log recording who made the change, Admin or otherwise. In these cases the revision logs indicate Emcee Flesher is the only user who made revisions.
P.S. Although Admins can change licenses on submissions, we do NOT do so. Even when the license is incorrect based on derivative chain, we only mark it as a license issue and allow the submitter to explain and/or make that change themselves.
Nope. They were CC BY-SA 4.0 from the beginning. Site logs show the initial submission was set to CC-BY-SA 4.0, not CC-BY initially, then changed later. Confirmed by Archive.org on their very first snapshot of that submission: https://web.archive.org/web/20210423082200/https://opengameart.org/conte...
Would you be willing to modify the medkits? Specifically the ones with the red cross on a white background. That symbol is legally protected and cannot be used in video games without permission from the International Red Cross.
Groovy. Thanks.
Where is the vector image from?
Nice. How was the tree made? It looks like a familiar technique.
Ah, yes. ANY ONE of the three, not all three at once. Though please do list all 3 licenses in your credits so other people know they also have that same choice.
@slade_38012: If you don't understand GPL, I recommend choosing one of the other two licenses. Namely, CC-BY 4.0, which is easier to understand, IMHO.
Click on any license tile (like
for example) for more information about it.
Under the terms of CC-BY 4.0 you are indeed allowed to modify the image and use it in your game/youtube-video/t-shirt printing business/whatever, commercially or non-commercially, so long as you give proper credit to SCay. Check out the FAQ for one good way to give credit: https://opengameart.org/content/faq#q-how-to-credit. For instance, add the following text to your credits page or credits screen:
Let us know if you have other questions. :)
@Roman Genkhel: See FAQ https://opengameart.org/content/faq#q-how-to-credit
Ooh, good idea for the Fall Jam!
Other submissions are too recent for archive.org to have a snapshot, but the only other one with a license change shows you made two revisions, one where you note changing the license from "the wrong license; CC-BY-3.0" to something else (Site logs show it already had CC-BY-SA, but you added CC-BY as well) and another where you change the license again; "removed SA license" (instead of both CC-BY and CC-BY-SA, you removed the -SA and left just the CC-BY) so the total timeline of licenses on it is:
I should also note there is no mechanism for the site to change licenses on its own. Both you and administrators could change the license, but there is no way to do so without the revision log recording who made the change, Admin or otherwise. In these cases the revision logs indicate Emcee Flesher is the only user who made revisions.
P.S. Although Admins can change licenses on submissions, we do NOT do so. Even when the license is incorrect based on derivative chain, we only mark it as a license issue and allow the submitter to explain and/or make that change themselves.
Nope. They were CC BY-SA 4.0 from the beginning. Site logs show the initial submission was set to CC-BY-SA 4.0, not CC-BY initially, then changed later. Confirmed by Archive.org on their very first snapshot of that submission: https://web.archive.org/web/20210423082200/https://opengameart.org/conte...
EDIT: clarity.
I love it!
Would you be willing to modify the medkits? Specifically the ones with the red cross on a white background. That symbol is legally protected and cannot be used in video games without permission from the International Red Cross.
Pages