Apologies for missing this, but if the texture is CC-BY 3.0, this model must also be CC-BY 3.0 and the attribution for the texture should be included in the Attrbution Notice section. That or the texture must be replaced with a CC0 texture.
If these are derived from various licenses, this submission must adopt the more restrictive license. Displaying both CC-BY 4.0 and CC0 implies people may use all the sound effects herein under the terms of just CC0 if they so chose, which does not adhere to the samples under CC-BY 4.0. The credits.txt should remain as-is, so that people may elect to use the individual CC0 samples under that license, but if people are going by the overall license, it should be CC-BY 4.0 to avoid bad assumptions.
Revision notes are publicly visible in the "revision" tab, but only to those who are logged in. Notes like this should probably be added to the description rather than comments section.
Good question. I mean, yes the artwork and design is copyrighted (of which this does not seem to be a derivative), but I need to see if the similarities here infringe upon the trademark. At the very least the term "UNO" should not be associated with a clearly similar card game.
https://opengameart.org/content/japanese-samurai-ninja-battle-trailer
@oofoe: this isn't a Krita file. It's a GIMP file. I was able to open it in GIMP and everything is present.
Apologies for missing this, but if the texture is CC-BY 3.0, this model must also be CC-BY 3.0 and the attribution for the texture should be included in the Attrbution Notice section. That or the texture must be replaced with a CC0 texture.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Excellent sound effects!
If these are derived from various licenses, this submission must adopt the more restrictive license. Displaying both CC-BY 4.0 and CC0 implies people may use all the sound effects herein under the terms of just CC0 if they so chose, which does not adhere to the samples under CC-BY 4.0. The credits.txt should remain as-is, so that people may elect to use the individual CC0 samples under that license, but if people are going by the overall license, it should be CC-BY 4.0 to avoid bad assumptions.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Nice!
Where are the credits listed?
There is no requirement that profile pictures adhere to submission guidelines; you aren't sharing your profile picture for FOSS distribution.
There are no restrictions beyond "try to keep it SFW" and "do not attempt to impersonate other users".
Revision notes are publicly visible in the "revision" tab, but only to those who are logged in. Notes like this should probably be added to the description rather than comments section.
Thanks for the updated work!
I really like this. A supreme example of "minimalist ≠ dull"
bumped for new content.
Good question. I mean, yes the artwork and design is copyrighted (of which this does not seem to be a derivative), but I need to see if the similarities here infringe upon the trademark. At the very least the term "UNO" should not be associated with a clearly similar card game.
Pages