"...Are you hosting materials that you did not 100% create?"
Yes. Almost all of the assets on this site I did not 100% create. Fortunately, those that did create them have a clear provenance and licensing.
Currently, AI assisted assets do not. I hope that changes, but until then, it is a legal risk for our users to utilize AI assets. Which is why they are flagged as having a "potential licensing issue."
The motivations for this are already outlined in the submission guidelines and the "AI Assisted Artwork" collection, which you have seen, but apparently need some clarification. It would be better to address any questions you have on that thread, but I am happy to answer questions here as well, if you would prefer.
"Art" includes music. All submissions on this site are forms of art, not just graphical art. The requirements for AI assisted art submissions apply to music in the same way.
All AI tools (GANs et al) apply to this requirement. It is your responsibility as the submitter to list which technologies were used in the creation of the assets above. If you are unable or unwilling to do so, I must remove the submission.
Per site submission guidelines, please indicate in the description above: the specific AI technologies used, their versions, and a link to the AI technologies' Terms of Use page.
Per site submission guidelines, please indicate in the description above: the specific AI technologies used, their versions, and a link to the AI technologies' Terms of Use page.
Apologies for missing this, but if the texture is CC-BY 3.0, this model must also be CC-BY 3.0 and the attribution for the texture should be included in the Attrbution Notice section. That or the texture must be replaced with a CC0 texture.
Yes. Almost all of the assets on this site I did not 100% create. Fortunately, those that did create them have a clear provenance and licensing.
Currently, AI assisted assets do not. I hope that changes, but until then, it is a legal risk for our users to utilize AI assets. Which is why they are flagged as having a "potential licensing issue."
The motivations for this are already outlined in the submission guidelines and the "AI Assisted Artwork" collection, which you have seen, but apparently need some clarification. It would be better to address any questions you have on that thread, but I am happy to answer questions here as well, if you would prefer.
That is incorrect.
"Art" includes music. All submissions on this site are forms of art, not just graphical art. The requirements for AI assisted art submissions apply to music in the same way.
All AI tools (GANs et al) apply to this requirement. It is your responsibility as the submitter to list which technologies were used in the creation of the assets above. If you are unable or unwilling to do so, I must remove the submission.
Per site submission guidelines, please indicate in the description above: the specific AI technologies used, their versions, and a link to the AI technologies' Terms of Use page.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Per site submission guidelines, please indicate in the description above: the specific AI technologies used, their versions, and a link to the AI technologies' Terms of Use page.
Not sure this qualifies as broaching the topic, since there are already several discussions about it already present on the site (one example: https://opengameart.org/content/artificial-intelligence-assisted-artwork ) but I do agree it should be discussed.
Is this based on the Minecraft texture?
Any time. Loving these mash-ups. :)
https://opengameart.org/content/japanese-samurai-ninja-battle-trailer
@oofoe: this isn't a Krita file. It's a GIMP file. I was able to open it in GIMP and everything is present.
Apologies for missing this, but if the texture is CC-BY 3.0, this model must also be CC-BY 3.0 and the attribution for the texture should be included in the Attrbution Notice section. That or the texture must be replaced with a CC0 texture.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Pages