In my experience it has seemed that the search has only looked at the contents of the description while ignoring the title and tags.
The GPL states: "You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the rights granted or affirmed under this License."
If the contents of the Copyright/Attribution Notice are meant to apply on top of the GPL then they are invalid.
If they are an alternative licening option then they should be fine but you should probably make that more clear.
Awesome stuff.
It is downloadable. I just downloaded it. Now I can finally make my dream Mario game without fear of legal action from Nintendo.
CGA standard modes are four colour.
The standard palettes have high-intensity and low-intensity versions.
You are mixing colours from both high-intensity and low-intensity palettes resulting in more than four colours.
Awesome stuff but it looks like you're mixing high-intensity and low-intensity palettes together.
Presuming the sprites/tiles are fixed size bounds and laid out in a regular grid, measure the bounds size (and starting offset if necessary) then index in row-major order by:
rowLength = floor((imageWidth - offsetX) / tileWidth)row = floor(index / rowLength)column = index % rowLengthtileX = offsetX + column * tileWidthtileY = offsetY + row * tileHeight
Someone gives you something for nothing and you demand they give you more? Personally there would be few better ways to earn my eternal animosity.
If they've stated in their submission that they are unsure of licensing then it's fine to advise them on the matter.
To baselessly presume ignorance is just plain disrespectful.
In my experience it has seemed that the search has only looked at the contents of the description while ignoring the title and tags.
The GPL states: "You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the rights granted or affirmed under this License."
If the contents of the Copyright/Attribution Notice are meant to apply on top of the GPL then they are invalid.
If they are an alternative licening option then they should be fine but you should probably make that more clear.
The GPL states: "You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the rights granted or affirmed under this License."
If the contents of the Copyright/Attribution Notice are meant to apply on top of the GPL then they are invalid.
If they are an alternative licening option then they should be fine but you should probably make that more clear.
Awesome stuff.
It is downloadable. I just downloaded it. Now I can finally make my dream Mario game without fear of legal action from Nintendo.
CGA standard modes are four colour.
The standard palettes have high-intensity and low-intensity versions.
You are mixing colours from both high-intensity and low-intensity palettes resulting in more than four colours.
Awesome stuff but it looks like you're mixing high-intensity and low-intensity palettes together.
Presuming the sprites/tiles are fixed size bounds and laid out in a regular grid, measure the bounds size (and starting offset if necessary) then index in row-major order by:
rowLength = floor((imageWidth - offsetX) / tileWidth)
row = floor(index / rowLength)
column = index % rowLength
tileX = offsetX + column * tileWidth
tileY = offsetY + row * tileHeight
Someone gives you something for nothing and you demand they give you more? Personally there would be few better ways to earn my eternal animosity.
If they've stated in their submission that they are unsure of licensing then it's fine to advise them on the matter.
To baselessly presume ignorance is just plain disrespectful.
Pages