In tortoiseSVN, you should go in an empty folder, rightclick -> checkout and there give the "http://osare.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/" address. Have you tried that?
I think for the falling down phase, you should rotate them earlier/faster, then it would look more natural. Like they should only "fly" in the direction their head points to.
I agree on most points too. I'd suggest a +1/-1 (and implicit 0) voting scheme (à la youtube).
In the case of really good art, a huge amount of users would vote +1, everything would be fine. In case of so-so art, you'd probably have most people not voting (thus, "voting 0"), maybe a few say +1 but some others say -1 too. And finally in the case of bad art, lots of people would still just not vote, but hopefully there would still be a few -1.
As for the case of voting +1 because of the author, not the art, if the art really is not good, it should get enough -1 to compensate the +1 from friends. If someone gets half the community to vote +1 on his shitty art, he deserves it :)
This is just my suggestion, as I think having dedicated/trusted persons giving their vote not only adds a lot of administration cost, but also just moves the problem to somewhere else, less visible: who to choose? can you say "no" if someone motivated wants it? etc.
Also, I would rather see that time invested into building a daily or weekly "featured art" section than on grading every single entry, which would become very burdensome if we get more entries.
Also, what I think is seriously lacking, is an "advanced search", I cannot even say what kind of art I want to search! (Or am I being blind?)
I don't want to sound harsh or whatever, but this is funny. Some while ago, when I read that 0AD released all their art to the public I suggested to ask them if we could post it here and you guys (don't remember who) said like "we don't do such things". Now I don't want to spend my time on this anymore :(
Anyways, if now "we do it", I suggest 0AD, they have great art!
Edit: It's just that it bugs me when something is first "no" and then "yes".
stop using the external libraries, start using C++0x! It has builtin regular expressions. MSVC++ supports them already, libstdc++ is working on it (it's the last big feature they're missing unfortunately)
This is awesome, thanks for the link! Would be great if it worked nearly well for midpoly and lowpoly models too. I will try that out soon!
I might try to put this (human) rig onto pfunked's human base model, and add a mouth to it, will be interesting!
In tortoiseSVN, you should go in an empty folder, rightclick -> checkout and there give the "http://osare.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/" address. Have you tried that?
To me it sounds more like a western, whit the cowboys facing the sheriff and stuff like that :-)
I think for the falling down phase, you should rotate them earlier/faster, then it would look more natural. Like they should only "fly" in the direction their head points to.
I would not only consider output files, but also output callback functions.
xD Brandon, those are the best, short, concise, attracting attention and right to the point.
When you turn the last one around, it even rhymes (at least with my accent ;)
OGA, open to everyone, like yo momma
I agree on most points too. I'd suggest a +1/-1 (and implicit 0) voting scheme (à la youtube).
In the case of really good art, a huge amount of users would vote +1, everything would be fine. In case of so-so art, you'd probably have most people not voting (thus, "voting 0"), maybe a few say +1 but some others say -1 too. And finally in the case of bad art, lots of people would still just not vote, but hopefully there would still be a few -1.
As for the case of voting +1 because of the author, not the art, if the art really is not good, it should get enough -1 to compensate the +1 from friends. If someone gets half the community to vote +1 on his shitty art, he deserves it :)
This is just my suggestion, as I think having dedicated/trusted persons giving their vote not only adds a lot of administration cost, but also just moves the problem to somewhere else, less visible: who to choose? can you say "no" if someone motivated wants it? etc.
Also, I would rather see that time invested into building a daily or weekly "featured art" section than on grading every single entry, which would become very burdensome if we get more entries.
Also, what I think is seriously lacking, is an "advanced search", I cannot even say what kind of art I want to search! (Or am I being blind?)
I don't want to sound harsh or whatever, but this is funny. Some while ago, when I read that 0AD released all their art to the public I suggested to ask them if we could post it here and you guys (don't remember who) said like "we don't do such things". Now I don't want to spend my time on this anymore :(
Anyways, if now "we do it", I suggest 0AD, they have great art!
Edit: It's just that it bugs me when something is first "no" and then "yes".
stop using the external libraries, start using C++0x! It has builtin regular expressions. MSVC++ supports them already, libstdc++ is working on it (it's the last big feature they're missing unfortunately)
Depends on your language. In python, there is one really easy: http://docs.python.org/library/wave.html
Pages