the flatscreen TV and smartphone are safe from trademark concerns. As long as you didn't use a copyrighted image or model to copy off of for those, they're also safe from copyright concerns.
Most devices don't have a strong enough design asthetic to have a solid trademark associated with the shape and theme of the device itself, but Nintendo's stuff is often an exception; Because the device itself is often the product logo (especially the switch) they have a strong trademark based on the very shape and look of their devices. The DS is possibly too close to Nintendo Trademark and definitely the Switch is too close to Nintendo Trademark, unfortunately.
If you are able to change both the color scheme and some of the underlying shape of those, it should help. However, as the gentlemen indicated above, the question of derivation still remains; what other objects/images/assets where used in the creation of those models and how were they used, if any?
I noticed your account keeps getting deleted because people are flagging you as a spammer. Then I noticed the tag you used. Would you like to update the tags on this submission before it happens again?
IIRC it was you the person that commented that it had not free license inside the archive file. The the creator said something like "I deleted the file with proprietary license and stick with OGA-BY3". I found that asset on itch and here so I writed comment here "Will you sync license here and on itch?". Then I got email that duplicates comment "Ah yes I'm having trouble with licenses. Unfortunately, I cannot make my own
on OGA. If that is a problem, I guess I'll just have to remove it from OGA". :\
Yes the history is retained and includes license. That scenario you outlined is one reason for the history, but a submission changing from a permissive license like CC0 to a more restrictive one like CC-BY-SA is pretty rare. Be cautious with using previous versions of submissions. They are usually changed for good reason. Often that reason is that the original license was never valid to begin with and the submitter was correcting it to account for derivative attribution.
Do you have a specific example in mind? You have only downloaded one asset (while logged in) so that is the only asset you'd be able to "prove" that you downloaded at an earlier time.
"Attribution not required"? Why the CC-BY license then? No complaints, just confused since CC-BY requires attribution.
lol!
Since I didn't make out of the desert, I was 'required' to give attribution. That was the imagry that came to mind as I listened to the song.
"This is Eldricth Grim's doing! CC0!" She shouts into the haboob, knowing she will never find her way across the scorching sand.
^Solid advice from Umplix and Ragnar.
the flatscreen TV and smartphone are safe from trademark concerns. As long as you didn't use a copyrighted image or model to copy off of for those, they're also safe from copyright concerns.
Most devices don't have a strong enough design asthetic to have a solid trademark associated with the shape and theme of the device itself, but Nintendo's stuff is often an exception; Because the device itself is often the product logo (especially the switch) they have a strong trademark based on the very shape and look of their devices. The DS is possibly too close to Nintendo Trademark and definitely the Switch is too close to Nintendo Trademark, unfortunately.
If you are able to change both the color scheme and some of the underlying shape of those, it should help. However, as the gentlemen indicated above, the question of derivation still remains; what other objects/images/assets where used in the creation of those models and how were they used, if any?
Haha!
Seriously though, Shadewing; this elephant is adorable.
I noticed your account keeps getting deleted because people are flagging you as a spammer. Then I noticed the tag you used. Would you like to update the tags on this submission before it happens again?
Is it an elephant?
opens fine for me. Can you take a screenshot of the page you're seeing?
...And what was the follow-up comment to that? https://opengameart.org/content/coolpunk-puzzle-platformer-asset-pack
Yes the history is retained and includes license. That scenario you outlined is one reason for the history, but a submission changing from a permissive license like CC0 to a more restrictive one like CC-BY-SA is pretty rare. Be cautious with using previous versions of submissions. They are usually changed for good reason. Often that reason is that the original license was never valid to begin with and the submitter was correcting it to account for derivative attribution.
Do you have a specific example in mind? You have only downloaded one asset (while logged in) so that is the only asset you'd be able to "prove" that you downloaded at an earlier time.
Pages