These tools have to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, but in general image editing AI tools are fine, only image generating AI tools are questionable. There is an argument regarding AI image generating tools being used to edit images, but I am specifically referring to tools that do not add content to an image that wasn't already there. Having intelligent anti-aliasing prediction for upscaling is not adding content in this context. Taking an image of a man & dog and morphing it into an image of a space man & space dog & alien catis adding content. If the tool is capable of adding content, it shouldn't be used for art on OGA (yet), even if you only used the tool to edit the image without adding content.
TL;DR: ILoveImg is fine. As of our current understanding, there is no potential for legal trouble with this tool.
If you have multiple versions of this derivative, please upload them together in one submission. There is no need to spread them out over 10 submissions each with a different colored alien.
No, just the assets it uses. What I mean is, your users are generating ships that fall under CC-BY-SA, but you are also using assets that fall under CC-BY-SA. Your users must adhere to the license if they use the ships created in your game, but so must you. That is all I meant. The license would not apply to your game itself, just those assets.
@ghawmzldjs71: Yes that would satisfy the license. Your game should also inlcude such attribution and license indications on it's credits page, but I assume you've already planned that, yes?
These tools have to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, but in general image editing AI tools are fine, only image generating AI tools are questionable. There is an argument regarding AI image generating tools being used to edit images, but I am specifically referring to tools that do not add content to an image that wasn't already there. Having intelligent anti-aliasing prediction for upscaling is not adding content in this context. Taking an image of a man & dog and morphing it into an image of a space man & space dog & alien cat is adding content. If the tool is capable of adding content, it shouldn't be used for art on OGA (yet), even if you only used the tool to edit the image without adding content.
TL;DR: ILoveImg is fine. As of our current understanding, there is no potential for legal trouble with this tool.
How big was the zip file after you put the whole folder in it?
Nice!... but, an "XP" icon that says "EX"?
I have never heard of that issue before, and strongly suspect your chromebook as the culprit.
I may have misunderstood. You are having difficulty downloading something from OGA?
I mean, you could always pack them into a .zip file as well, if you're concerned about downloaders having that difficulty.
Yes, you should edit this post as you make the aliens instead of delete it.
If you have multiple versions of this derivative, please upload them together in one submission. There is no need to spread them out over 10 submissions each with a different colored alien.
No, just the assets it uses. What I mean is, your users are generating ships that fall under CC-BY-SA, but you are also using assets that fall under CC-BY-SA. Your users must adhere to the license if they use the ships created in your game, but so must you. That is all I meant. The license would not apply to your game itself, just those assets.
@ghawmzldjs71: Yes that would satisfy the license. Your game should also inlcude such attribution and license indications on it's credits page, but I assume you've already planned that, yes?
Pages