The tablesare broken, the legs should be 1px thinner each, otherwise the middle peace can't loop properly. This can bee seen in the indoor preview at the table on the bottom right.
It does not look like upscaling goes well for you. If you don't scale by a power of 2, you break straight diagonal lines. The big versions of strange dragon's diamonds become pointier at the top.
I wrote a comment under a different artwork of strangedragon81, asking if they are willing to upload stuff here on oga, so we might get in contact with that person. CC-BY might align with their conditions.
It could be helpful to remove everything, but the the stuff he did himself could be used, or replacing it with some basic sketch to retain the overall shape. Then it would rather be concept art.
I would really like to adapt some of your ideas, though.
There is a bit a lack of sci-fi pixelart, it feels like most is fantasy.
"No license" means you get an implicit license for using it in the scope where it was posted, which mostly means to download and use it personally. You have to get written permission for everything else.
That's why we use Creative Commons licenses, there is an easy to understand short version. With CC-BY you can use, modify and sell it as much as you want, without legal risks or asking for permission.
Those screenshots sound like an implicit license to use it in a game, but not to modify and distribute it. I'm not a lawyer, I dunno for sure. I use stuff licensed under Creative Commons licenses to avoid this legal crap. For uploading it here, you would need to ask those people if they can upload it here or on deviantart under a free license (CC0, CC-BY) or give you explicit permission to upload your modifications.
CC0 is closer to no license than an implicit license. It's not like we are doing all this because we want to sue, annoy, troll or demotivate people.
This is more related to just the paintings:
You can ignore all this, it most likely will be tolerated and go well. But it does not have to. With a commercial game that can mean, you invested much time, lose some(?) of your earnings and pay a fine or something like that.
LPC has other dimensions than his characters, but the head implant and those weird eyes could be adapted to LPC heads.
It could be helpful to remove everything, but the the stuff he did himself could be used, or replacing it with some basic sketch to retain the overall shape. Then it would rather be concept art.
Customer: "I purchased this software because it said we could use its results for our 2D games. Unfortunately, and to my knowledge it is still unclear to non-users willing to purchase, the software as of now only authorizes usage of its contents for "RPG Maker""
Developer: "We are doing everything we can alleviate this restriction which comes sadly from the RPG Maker license itself."
I partly translated this to LPC style https://opengameart.org/content/lpc-goes-to-space
Good job.
I used a chopped version as energy cristals in my sci-fi set: https://opengameart.org/content/lpc-goes-to-space.
I changed the colors a bit, so I can have a smaller color palette, and changed the width to an even number.
The tablesare broken, the legs should be 1px thinner each, otherwise the middle peace can't loop properly. This can bee seen in the indoor preview at the table on the bottom right.
I included and fixed the table in my sci-fi set, but I changed the colors a bit: https://opengameart.org/content/lpc-goes-to-space
If somebody wants to use it with the original version, the colors must be changed back, otherwise the chairs won't fit.
Good job.
Two of your links are not working.
LPC needs you to put any modifications under the same license ("shar alike") and it's 32x32.
RPG Make MV is only 48x48 as far as I undertand.
48x48 sets might be better: https://opengameart.org/content/space-scifi-rpg-tiles-48x48
It does not look like upscaling goes well for you. If you don't scale by a power of 2, you break straight diagonal lines. The big versions of strange dragon's diamonds become pointier at the top.
I wrote a comment under a different artwork of strangedragon81, asking if they are willing to upload stuff here on oga, so we might get in contact with that person. CC-BY might align with their conditions.
But judging from other posts, it's likely that is oiriginal art (edits were explicitly mentioned on other posts) and that you are only allowed to use it in it's original state, since other posts explicitly mention edits ("You are free to edit these resources to fit your needs, but please do not post such edits.")
Moving pictures on hover like on porn sites.
@Botanic: you commited in git as "root"
What I would like to see: (not design; totally overkill)
I do not really care for the frontpage, but maybe it would be nice to customize it with filters.
I only care for 2D and I guess some are more into 3D.
Maybe pinning searches to the front.
I would really like to adapt some of your ideas, though.
There is a bit a lack of sci-fi pixelart, it feels like most is fantasy.
https://opengameart.org/content/lpc-skorpios-scifi-sprite-pack + https://opengameart.org/content/sci-fi-blue-pillar
"No license" means you get an implicit license for using it in the scope where it was posted, which mostly means to download and use it personally. You have to get written permission for everything else.
That's why we use Creative Commons licenses, there is an easy to understand short version. With CC-BY you can use, modify and sell it as much as you want, without legal risks or asking for permission.
Those screenshots sound like an implicit license to use it in a game, but not to modify and distribute it. I'm not a lawyer, I dunno for sure. I use stuff licensed under Creative Commons licenses to avoid this legal crap. For uploading it here, you would need to ask those people if they can upload it here or on deviantart under a free license (CC0, CC-BY) or give you explicit permission to upload your modifications.
CC0 is closer to no license than an implicit license. It's not like we are doing all this because we want to sue, annoy, troll or demotivate people.
This is more related to just the paintings:
You can ignore all this, it most likely will be tolerated and go well. But it does not have to. With a commercial game that can mean, you invested much time, lose some(?) of your earnings and pay a fine or something like that.
Edit: Better use those paintings:
Yes, I know.
It's too much work for just sharing something.
LPC has other dimensions than his characters, but the head implant and those weird eyes could be adapted to LPC heads.
It could be helpful to remove everything, but the the stuff he did himself could be used, or replacing it with some basic sketch to retain the overall shape. Then it would rather be concept art.
I really think the cyborg guy could be done with LPC http://gaurav.munjal.us/Universal-LPC-Spritesheet-Character-Generator/#?...
Edit: It also appears that the assets, which come with Game Character Hub, are only allowed to be used with RPG Maker.
"RPG Maker assets are for RPG Maker use only."
https://store.steampowered.com/app/292230/Game_Character_Hub/
Customer: "I purchased this software because it said we could use its results for our 2D games. Unfortunately, and to my knowledge it is still unclear to non-users willing to purchase, the software as of now only authorizes usage of its contents for "RPG Maker""
Developer: "We are doing everything we can alleviate this restriction which comes sadly from the RPG Maker license itself."
https://steamcommunity.com/id/Aekar/recommended/292230/
Pages