Yeah, in the context of fair use, it's okay to post game screenshots and such, although I'd recommend saving them as fairly low quality jpegs (perhaps at reduced resolution) to make sure the graphics aren't really rippable and make note with your post that it's fair use and not openly licensed.
Sorry about that. You shouldn't have any more issues.
Are you going through a proxy by any chance? That's triggered the spam filter in the past. At any rate, your account bypasses the filter now, so it shouldn't bother you anymore. :)
On second glance, there were a few places in the set that appear to be direct edits (specifically the tents and the clock face). I removed those and replaced the file.
I checked this against the RMXP set and this set appears original to me. Unflagging license issue. Again, sorry for the trouble. When someone points out a potential issue with licensing, we have to look into it.
We're looking into it. This looks like an original set to me, but since someone told me it may not be, I have to check. I'm in the process right now, and I hope we'll have a word out in half an hour. Again, sorry for the inconvenience.
Flagged potential licensing issue. This is an amazing set, but if it's an edit of the RMXP set, we can't archive it here, since it's a derivative work of someone else's IP. I just assumed it was a drop-in replacement, since it looks pretty different from the RMXP set.
When people mention LPC tilesets, they're referring to tilesets that would be okay to use in the Liberated Pixel Cup, which is a game programming contest that's in progress right now. (There was an art contest too, but it ended at the end of last month.)
I don't see that single word change clearing up the confusion, honestly. As a user, you use content under the license of your choice, but as an author, you release content under all of the licenses of your choice. Since the checkbox is about the licenses the content is released under, using 'any' there doesn't really make sense. I'll see about putting some small descriptive text under the licenses to make it clear that users can choose which one they prefer.
Yeah, in the context of fair use, it's okay to post game screenshots and such, although I'd recommend saving them as fairly low quality jpegs (perhaps at reduced resolution) to make sure the graphics aren't really rippable and make note with your post that it's fair use and not openly licensed.
Yeah, the OFL is fine.
Sorry about that. You shouldn't have any more issues.
Are you going through a proxy by any chance? That's triggered the spam filter in the past. At any rate, your account bypasses the filter now, so it shouldn't bother you anymore. :)
On second glance, there were a few places in the set that appear to be direct edits (specifically the tents and the clock face). I removed those and replaced the file.
I checked this against the RMXP set and this set appears original to me. Unflagging license issue. Again, sorry for the trouble. When someone points out a potential issue with licensing, we have to look into it.
We're looking into it. This looks like an original set to me, but since someone told me it may not be, I have to check. I'm in the process right now, and I hope we'll have a word out in half an hour. Again, sorry for the inconvenience.
Flagged potential licensing issue. This is an amazing set, but if it's an edit of the RMXP set, we can't archive it here, since it's a derivative work of someone else's IP. I just assumed it was a drop-in replacement, since it looks pretty different from the RMXP set.
Wonderful set, thank you for submitting it!
When people mention LPC tilesets, they're referring to tilesets that would be okay to use in the Liberated Pixel Cup, which is a game programming contest that's in progress right now. (There was an art contest too, but it ended at the end of last month.)
I don't know if I'd really call javascript rare these days. :)
I don't see that single word change clearing up the confusion, honestly. As a user, you use content under the license of your choice, but as an author, you release content under all of the licenses of your choice. Since the checkbox is about the licenses the content is released under, using 'any' there doesn't really make sense. I'll see about putting some small descriptive text under the licenses to make it clear that users can choose which one they prefer.
Pages