Okay, first off, I love SC2, and provided the legal stuff is in place, I'd like to give this my full endorsement.
My question is this -- I know SC2 was released for free as the Ur Quan Masters (those of you reading this who haven't played UQM should go do it now!), but the art licensing wasn't truly open source (maybe it was noncommercial only or something?). Do you guys have a license from Toys for Bob to make use of their IP? If the license to the original art is CC-BY-NC or CC-BY-SA-NC, then you should be good to go.
(Edit: My question is answered below. While the art isn't technically Libre, there are no licensing issues with this project.)
To everyone else: If the licensing is in place, THIS IS AWESOME. Help this guy out! :)
I removed the incompatible licenses. Without separating them into multiple submissions, it's too hard to keep track of which ones are modifications and which ones are brand new, so it's safer just to call it all CC-BY.
This is a known bug, and unfortunately it hasn't been as easy to fix as I had hoped. In all honesty, I'm not even sure what's causing it, as the bookmarks view works fine in the views editor. It's just broken on the user pages.
Okay, first off, I love SC2, and provided the legal stuff is in place, I'd like to give this my full endorsement.
My question is this -- I know SC2 was released for free as the Ur Quan Masters (those of you reading this who haven't played UQM should go do it now!), but the art licensing wasn't truly open source (maybe it was noncommercial only or something?). Do you guys have a license from Toys for Bob to make use of their IP? If the license to the original art is CC-BY-NC or CC-BY-SA-NC, then you should be good to go.
(Edit: My question is answered below. While the art isn't technically Libre, there are no licensing issues with this project.)
To everyone else: If the licensing is in place, THIS IS AWESOME. Help this guy out! :)
On paper this time. 1, 2, and 3 are the best, the rest are mostly junk.
I removed the incompatible licenses. Without separating them into multiple submissions, it's too hard to keep track of which ones are modifications and which ones are brand new, so it's safer just to call it all CC-BY.
This is a known bug, and unfortunately it hasn't been as easy to fix as I had hoped. In all honesty, I'm not even sure what's causing it, as the bookmarks view works fine in the views editor. It's just broken on the user pages.
Ugh. I'm not doing that well today. This is the best I could come up with after several false starts. I'm trying to work on the midsection.
Ref: http://markdaughn.deviantart.com/gallery/?catpath=/&offset=120#/d2e1kwr (NUDITY)
That's hilarious :)
Yes, as long as you credit the author appropriately, you can use them commercially. This is true of anything that's licensed CC-BY.
Bart
I'm not sure what's confusing about it. Having a larger water animation makes the water a bit less repetitive.
This is a known bug. I'll look at it when I get the chance. In the meantime, I'm sorry for the trouble.
The model is veery good btw.
Yeah, it's a nice model. Wish I could say I could have done it myself. :)
Pages