I agree with AntumDeluge. This shares substantial similarities with Redshrike's mage. If this is based on Redshrike's sprites, that's perfectly fine, but the license requires you to credit him here for derivatives. Untill we know more I have to mark this with a licensing issue.
AntumDeluge is correct. k-skills, would you be willing to change the license(s) to OGA-BY and/or CC-BY? Until then I have to mark this as having a licensing issue.
Thanks for letting us know. this particular error is mostly harmless. It just freaked out about some of the images in the comments after you commented. We'll look into it, but your comment is fine. :)
Done. Though the sidebar is designed for art challenges, so I don't think it would work well for showing the jam. it will say "Art Challenge" and link to art subission functions. Want me to try it anyway?
It's true name-calling is not appropriate here. Looks like it has stopped voluntarily, though, so that's a non-issue at this point. (I think an apology would help, but at this point I'm not sure it would really mend any relationships, so it may be best to just put that to rest.)
And, believe it or not, MNDV can ask that others not use his/her code; (s)he retains copyright to that code unless a specific license was agreed upon. Even then it sounds like the conditions upon which that code license was to be made available has been canceled by both parties. When you don't want to purchase a product any longer and you take your money back, you don't get to keep the product. It seem MNDV has clearly indicated which code is no longer licensed to this project. "Adapting" that code to another language or framework is inadvisable since it would be a derivative, not "starting from scratch".
...Which also seems like a non-issue since everyone wants to start from scratch anyway. A lot of talk about things that don't really apply any longer, people.
MNDV is free to warn everyone about his/her own experience on this project as well as revoke license to services-renderd-but-not-compensated.
Tyrantcomics is free to defend his/her position, tell his/her side of the experience, as well as invite others to participate in the project and replace components (s)he feels were inadequately rendered.
Everyone else is free to decide for themselves if they want to work on this project or not.
I agree with AntumDeluge. This shares substantial similarities with Redshrike's mage. If this is based on Redshrike's sprites, that's perfectly fine, but the license requires you to credit him here for derivatives.
Untill we know more I have to mark this with a licensing issue.EDIT: fixed, thanks.
AntumDeluge is correct. k-skills, would you be willing to change the license(s) to OGA-BY and/or CC-BY?
Until then I have to mark this as having a licensing issue.EDIT: fixed, thanks.
I love it! Looks like one of the Belmonts. :)
Nice. These are pretty minor by themselves. Would you be willing to combine all the tiles into one submission?
P.S. the "2D" tag is unnecessary considering the art is already in the 2D category. Redundant tags are routinely deleted.
Thanks for letting us know. this particular error is mostly harmless. It just freaked out about some of the images in the comments after you commented. We'll look into it, but your comment is fine. :)
art challenge side-bar is also up now. :)
Was your friend logged in at the time he downloaded the song? What is his username, if any?
Done. Though the sidebar is designed for art challenges, so I don't think it would work well for showing the jam. it will say "Art Challenge" and link to art subission functions. Want me to try it anyway?
heh! :) That seems like a question you've asked before. Why would there be a problem with fictional politics?
It's true name-calling is not appropriate here. Looks like it has stopped voluntarily, though, so that's a non-issue at this point. (I think an apology would help, but at this point I'm not sure it would really mend any relationships, so it may be best to just put that to rest.)
And, believe it or not, MNDV can ask that others not use his/her code; (s)he retains copyright to that code unless a specific license was agreed upon. Even then it sounds like the conditions upon which that code license was to be made available has been canceled by both parties. When you don't want to purchase a product any longer and you take your money back, you don't get to keep the product. It seem MNDV has clearly indicated which code is no longer licensed to this project. "Adapting" that code to another language or framework is inadvisable since it would be a derivative, not "starting from scratch".
...Which also seems like a non-issue since everyone wants to start from scratch anyway. A lot of talk about things that don't really apply any longer, people.
Pages