"It lies in the fact that in doing that, my username will still appear as Author"
I'm aware. My instructions are still the best way to indicate who the artist is. There is an option for showing another name as the "Author" instead of the uploader, but it isn't working right now and we're still working on fixing it. Therefore, it is understood by most that "Author" is the uploader, but credit should be given to whomever is listed in the copyright/attribution section. So the best way to describe that is exactly what I suggested above.
Your suggestion for the text of the copyright/attribution notice section seems good to me.
@n2Liquid: I see you Added him/her as a collaborator. That's a good start. The next thing to do is list ArthCarvalho in the "Copyright/Attribution Notice" section of the submission. Something like:
@bluecarrot16: I agree. Thanks n2liquid and ArthCarvalho for providing those WIP samples. I appreciate your patience in this. Please let me know if any component used RTP assets as a guide or basis for making these. And keep making great assets! These are lovely. :)
If that's the only license you have listed for the submission, that makes sense. Gotta tell it what licenses you want to find too. :)
The 4.0 licenses are not currently searched by default, but we're working on that. In the meantime, I recommend also releasing the asset under the 3.0 licenses as well. That will allow it to show up in tag searches without specifying the license since it will get either 3.0 or 4.0 licenses.
The default value of CC-BY-SA 4.0 has nothing to do with OGA's values. You'll notice CC-BY-SA 3.0 is also anti-DRM yet is selected by default. The only reason 4.0 is not checked is because it is a newer license and the code was not set up correctly when it was added after 3.0. We're working to fix it.
I like A. Seems more like a face.
"It lies in the fact that in doing that, my username will still appear as Author"
I'm aware. My instructions are still the best way to indicate who the artist is. There is an option for showing another name as the "Author" instead of the uploader, but it isn't working right now and we're still working on fixing it. Therefore, it is understood by most that "Author" is the uploader, but credit should be given to whomever is listed in the copyright/attribution section. So the best way to describe that is exactly what I suggested above.
Your suggestion for the text of the copyright/attribution notice section seems good to me.
Not sure where the confusion is. The best way to describe that is exactly what I suggested above.
@n2Liquid: I see you Added him/her as a collaborator. That's a good start. The next thing to do is list ArthCarvalho in the "Copyright/Attribution Notice" section of the submission. Something like:
You've put candy in my ears.
How does this post differ from https://opengameart.org/forumtopic/need-a-pixel-zombies ?
@bluecarrot16: I agree. Thanks n2liquid and ArthCarvalho for providing those WIP samples. I appreciate your patience in this. Please let me know if any component used RTP assets as a guide or basis for making these. And keep making great assets! These are lovely. :)
If that's the only license you have listed for the submission, that makes sense. Gotta tell it what licenses you want to find too. :)
The 4.0 licenses are not currently searched by default, but we're working on that. In the meantime, I recommend also releasing the asset under the 3.0 licenses as well. That will allow it to show up in tag searches without specifying the license since it will get either 3.0 or 4.0 licenses.
The default value of CC-BY-SA 4.0 has nothing to do with OGA's values. You'll notice CC-BY-SA 3.0 is also anti-DRM yet is selected by default. The only reason 4.0 is not checked is because it is a newer license and the code was not set up correctly when it was added after 3.0. We're working to fix it.
Pages