Looks like that was set to an Admin-only option. Spammers were probably abusing it to get their submissions past review, then reverting it to an ad for counterfeit purses or something.
I never mind helping with this kind of thing, though. :)
What submission did you want to revert and to which date? If you'd rather, you can PM me, too.
However, I'm afraid the stipulations specified in the download's License.txt are in conflict with the CC-BY license you've chosen:
"The items cannot be sublicensed, resold, shared, transferred, or otherwise redistributed on its own (even for free)" Assets licensed CC-BY may be resold, shared, transferred, or redistributed. This is a requirement of the license.
"You can modify the items as you like but for your end product only. You can't sell, share, or distribute the derivative work as an stock item" Users are permitted to modify CC-BY assets for any reason, including for redistribution or 3rd party products. Derivative CC-BY assets may be shared, sold, or distributed.
It's not necessary to put my name or this site link on your game's credit page. But if you do that, I'll be more than happy." That's very generous, :) but CC-BY requires people credit you in some fashion if they use your assets.
I don't know why anyone would buy them from someone else when they can get it here for free, but people are still allowed to sell them. However, CC-BY also requires people to list you in the credits and link to your site or this submission page if you wish. So anyone trying to sell these would have to link their potential customers to a place they could get the same thing for free.Would you be willing to modify or remove the stipulations in the License.txt file? These are your works and how you want them licensed is your prerogative, of course, but I'm afraid we must insist the licenses available here on OGA be consistent with any assets shared on this site. Please let me know if you have any question about this or other licensing options. :) Until then I have to mark this as having a licensing issue. Thank you for understanding.
Tags should describe the asset itself though, not your username. People wanting to search for art made by "Quaternius" would use the separate search field dedicated to that. Tags indicating the creator of the asset instead of describing its content are redundant and routinely deleted.
Nice, but you should add the hero to the submission itself, not as a comment. Just click the "EDIT" tab at the top of the page and add him as another downloadable file. People aren't allowed to use art you post in the comments in the same way.
Also, it looks like there are 2 identical copies of the tree graphic, but no terrain tiles as shown in the preview. Are the ground tiles not part of the set?
Haha! Perhaps the whole game and indeed the very discussion of the game is all DLC.
Historically, the only video games more retro than atari were games on the Magnavox Odyssey and VideoSport systems. Although the first game released by atari was pong, pong existed before atari did and was released by other manufacturers first. In that case, is pong more retro than atari or is it exactly as retro? Never-the-less, I'm skeptical of the claim in the title, but also curious.
Assuming no explanation is forthcoming regarding the blank post, I'll have to remove this thread soon.
Congratulations and well done! :D
Looks like that was set to an Admin-only option. Spammers were probably abusing it to get their submissions past review, then reverting it to an ad for counterfeit purses or something.
I never mind helping with this kind of thing, though. :)
What submission did you want to revert and to which date? If you'd rather, you can PM me, too.
No problem. Thanks for sharing! :)
Great buttons!
However, I'm afraid the stipulations specified in the download's License.txt are in conflict with the CC-BY license you've chosen:"The items cannot be sublicensed, resold, shared, transferred, or otherwise redistributed on its own (even for free)" Assets licensed CC-BY may be resold, shared, transferred, or redistributed. This is a requirement of the license."You can modify the items as you like but for your end product only. You can't sell, share, or distribute the derivative work as an stock item" Users are permitted to modify CC-BY assets for any reason, including for redistribution or 3rd party products. Derivative CC-BY assets may be shared, sold, or distributed.It's not necessary to put my name or this site link on your game's credit page. But if you do that, I'll be more than happy." That's very generous, :) but CC-BY requires people credit you in some fashion if they use your assets.I don't know why anyone would buy them from someone else when they can get it here for free, but people are still allowed to sell them. However, CC-BY also requires people to list you in the credits and link to your site or this submission page if you wish. So anyone trying to sell these would have to link their potential customers to a place they could get the same thing for free.Would you be willing to modify or remove the stipulations in the License.txt file? These are your works and how you want them licensed is your prerogative, of course, but I'm afraid we must insist the licenses available here on OGA be consistent with any assets shared on this site. Please let me know if you have any question about this or other licensing options. :)Until then I have to mark this as having a licensing issue. Thank you for understanding.Groovy.
Tags should describe the asset itself though, not your username. People wanting to search for art made by "Quaternius" would use the separate search field dedicated to that. Tags indicating the creator of the asset instead of describing its content are redundant and routinely deleted.
Looks like you got the right url format now. :)
Wonderful textures! Thanks for sharing. I like your site, too. :)
Nice,
but you should add the hero to the submission itself, not as a comment. Just click the "EDIT" tab at the top of the page and add him as another downloadable file. People aren't allowed to use art you post in the comments in the same way.Also, it looks like there are 2 identical copies of the tree graphic, but no terrain tiles as shown in the preview. Are the ground tiles not part of the set?Haha! Perhaps the whole game and indeed the very discussion of the game is all DLC.
Historically, the only video games more retro than atari were games on the Magnavox Odyssey and VideoSport systems. Although the first game released by atari was pong, pong existed before atari did and was released by other manufacturers first. In that case, is pong more retro than atari or is it exactly as retro? Never-the-less, I'm skeptical of the claim in the title, but also curious.
Assuming no explanation is forthcoming regarding the blank post, I'll have to remove this thread soon.Thanks! Nice song.
Pages