The only extra forbidden stipulation is 'no porn' but yes, PeterX is correct that a 'no porn' stipulation makes it not-CC0. Nothing prevents you from making your own CC0-adjacent EULA, though.
Haha! @FiveBrosStopMossYT: That's good legal information and all, but I don't recommend encouraging people to add big walls of legal text to their submissions unnecessarily. Submissions are assumed to be legal by default. (Vast majority of people are very decent and never intentionally submit bad content) Justifying an asset's legality is only necessary if that legality is then called into question. In this case, StarNinjas has clarified that the sounds are merely imitating the sound effects of another game, not a ripped re-recording of them.
@StarNinjas: That means these were recorded/created without using any components of the original minecraft sound, right? If that is the case, they're fine. It is not necessary to pre-emptively argue against a protest that no one has made yet.
Though being a Minecraft rip is not the only thing that could make assets illegal. No need to add "therefore it is not illegal" as it just makes this seem more suspicious, not less.
Some of my suggestions may already have been done; I'm not the best at keeping up with LPC stuff. I know some seasonal tiles have partially been done, but any terrain or land feature that doesn't already have a Summer/Autumn/Winter/Spring equivalent is something I think many people could use.
craft shops?
Smelter/foundry
Clothing boutique/loom/textiles/dye vats
Blacksmith/Armorsmith/weaponsmith
Apothecary pretty much done!
Bakery/restaurant: lots of food items already. I think there's an oven, too. What other stuff would make sense for food prep?
Bowyer/Fletcher
mystic emporium/wizard's labratory: enchanting or imbuing things with magic. I imagine some device prominently featuring a large crystal (glowing or non). Like a crystal affixed to a stand. Not like a pedestal just for showing off a crystal, but a magical device where the crystal is the primary component making it function.
Thanks. The file has already been unblocked. :) Remember that you can still ask that people link back here in their credits. That is a good thing to put in the copyright/attribution box.
However, you should know the stipulation about 'don't resell, don't reupload' is unenforceable under this license. Due to those stipulations causing unintended consequences for developers (even in non-commercial projects), we do not accept any licenses here that disallow that. Not because we want others to profit off of your hard work, but because the law gets complicated around what constitutes resale and 'unmodified redistribution'. Some games separate the download of their assets and executables. (Minecraft for example, you can download texture packs separately) Does the stand-alone graphics pack violate the 'no stand alone redistribution' requirement? If they host the assets on a site where ads are used, that legally counts as using these to generate revenue, so 'no resale' is violated. I know that isn't your intent, but the point is those requirements make most assets impossible to use safely under an open license.
That being said, you could make it highly unlikely that anyone would be able to resell them if you chose a license like OGA-BY instead. With that license, the user is required to credit you and, if you request, include a link back to this page. At that point, anyone trying to resell these elsewhere would be required by law to include a link here, and any of their potential customers could easily see it is available here for free and wouldn't bother to pay them for it. They're still allowed to try to resell them, it just wouldn't be very effective.
Would you be willing to remove that stipulation? Until then, I have marked this as having a licensing issue in order to protect your interests.
The only extra forbidden stipulation is 'no porn' but yes, PeterX is correct that a 'no porn' stipulation makes it not-CC0. Nothing prevents you from making your own CC0-adjacent EULA, though.
Haha! @FiveBrosStopMossYT: That's good legal information and all, but I don't recommend encouraging people to add big walls of legal text to their submissions unnecessarily. Submissions are assumed to be legal by default. (Vast majority of people are very decent and never intentionally submit bad content) Justifying an asset's legality is only necessary if that legality is then called into question. In this case, StarNinjas has clarified that the sounds are merely imitating the sound effects of another game, not a ripped re-recording of them.
@StarNinjas: That means these were recorded/created without using any components of the original minecraft sound, right? If that is the case, they're fine. It is not necessary to pre-emptively argue against a protest that no one has made yet.
Cool.
Though being a Minecraft rip is not the only thing that could make assets illegal. No need to add "therefore it is not illegal" as it just makes this seem more suspicious, not less.+1 for all of Boom Shaka's suggestions :)
Some of my suggestions may already have been done; I'm not the best at keeping up with LPC stuff. I know some seasonal tiles have partially been done, but any terrain or land feature that doesn't already have a Summer/Autumn/Winter/Spring equivalent is something I think many people could use.
craft shops?
Apothecarypretty much done!Groovy. Thanks for sharing these. :)
Were any of the fire emblem graphics used to make them. Like using the basic shape or silhouette from fire emblem sprites?
Cool. Are these based on anything? Some of the styles seem somewhat familiar.
Thanks. The file has already been unblocked. :) Remember that you can still ask that people link back here in their credits. That is a good thing to put in the copyright/attribution box.
Not bad.
However, you should know the stipulation about 'don't resell, don't reupload' is unenforceable under this license. Due to those stipulations causing unintended consequences for developers (even in non-commercial projects), we do not accept any licenses here that disallow that. Not because we want others to profit off of your hard work, but because the law gets complicated around what constitutes resale and 'unmodified redistribution'. Some games separate the download of their assets and executables. (Minecraft for example, you can download texture packs separately) Does the stand-alone graphics pack violate the 'no stand alone redistribution' requirement? If they host the assets on a site where ads are used, that legally counts as using these to generate revenue, so 'no resale' is violated. I know that isn't your intent, but the point is those requirements make most assets impossible to use safely under an open license.That being said, you could make it highly unlikely that anyone would be able to resell them if you chose a license like OGA-BY instead. With that license, the user is required to credit you and, if you request, include a link back to this page. At that point, anyone trying to resell these elsewhere would be required by law to include a link here, and any of their potential customers could easily see it is available here for free and wouldn't bother to pay them for it. They're still allowed to try to resell them, it just wouldn't be very effective.Would you be willing to remove that stipulation? Until then, I have marked this as having a licensing issue in order to protect your interests.No problem. Welcome, and thanks for sharing :)
Pages