This is a false equivalency here. Commenting that someone is violating the rules in a bad way is not as bad as violating the rules yourself. I'd rather not chastise a valued contributor just to appear to be fair to someone breaking the rules left and right and demanding to get away with it. People who act that entitled to anything should be slapped down just so they don't think they can do worse.
That being said, if ChaosMikee is now banned, there's no reason to have additional comments on the whole situation. The threads should be locked and preferably made invisible. Not deleted, though. If the guy really makes a nuisance lawsuit (because that's all it'd be) it'd be nice to have copies of his posts that clearly indicate who we're dealing with here. No lawyer or judge or anybody can feel sympathic to this guy in even a small way after seeing his posts.
Actually meant other gem sets that look like the stereotypical gem you see in games. So yours look different from them and similar too each other, which is a good thing. Sorry I was unclear.
I think with gem graphics there's a lot of them that look roughly the same. That's both good and bad. I like how these have a different personality. Colors are cool too.
Wacky. Cool use of source material. A very specific style of game would come from this. Doesn't feel like one I'd make, but I can see myself playing it.
Since he's not going to sue (he'll just threaten it a few more times to try to save face) we should just ignore Mikee here. Like all trolls, he thrives on feeling important.
Again, dude, prove you know what you're trying to talk about. Sue. Or shut up.
We think you know less than a gnat about anything. We don't want to hear your theory about, well, anything. If you think you're right, then sue. Then we'll have an outside source saying you're ignorant instead of just all of us saying it.
So it doesn't get missed, the page surt points to pretty strongly supports that this is the same guy who just got banned recently (like anyone couldn't tell already). Total ban of this account would work too.
It'd be merciful, really. He's just making a sad public spectacle of himself. It's like a monkey throwing poo at a pane of glass protecting the zoo visitors.
This is a false equivalency here. Commenting that someone is violating the rules in a bad way is not as bad as violating the rules yourself. I'd rather not chastise a valued contributor just to appear to be fair to someone breaking the rules left and right and demanding to get away with it. People who act that entitled to anything should be slapped down just so they don't think they can do worse.
That being said, if ChaosMikee is now banned, there's no reason to have additional comments on the whole situation. The threads should be locked and preferably made invisible. Not deleted, though. If the guy really makes a nuisance lawsuit (because that's all it'd be) it'd be nice to have copies of his posts that clearly indicate who we're dealing with here. No lawyer or judge or anybody can feel sympathic to this guy in even a small way after seeing his posts.
Actually meant other gem sets that look like the stereotypical gem you see in games. So yours look different from them and similar too each other, which is a good thing. Sorry I was unclear.
Very colorful and bright. Has an old Atari vibe to it. Sometimes simplicity looks good.
I think with gem graphics there's a lot of them that look roughly the same. That's both good and bad. I like how these have a different personality. Colors are cool too.
Wacky. Cool use of source material. A very specific style of game would come from this. Doesn't feel like one I'd make, but I can see myself playing it.
Since he's not going to sue (he'll just threaten it a few more times to try to save face) we should just ignore Mikee here. Like all trolls, he thrives on feeling important.
Again, dude, prove you know what you're trying to talk about. Sue. Or shut up.
We think you know less than a gnat about anything. We don't want to hear your theory about, well, anything. If you think you're right, then sue. Then we'll have an outside source saying you're ignorant instead of just all of us saying it.
He decided to ban evade when his other account got banned and he just came back on with a puppet account.
So it doesn't get missed, the page surt points to pretty strongly supports that this is the same guy who just got banned recently (like anyone couldn't tell already). Total ban of this account would work too.
It'd be merciful, really. He's just making a sad public spectacle of himself. It's like a monkey throwing poo at a pane of glass protecting the zoo visitors.
I'm for it too. I don't remember the last ones, so have no idea how this would be set up.
If it's weekly it has to be something small and oissible but worthwhile. Monthly would be open up more possibilities.
Pages