Thanks for clarifying.
Another possibility is that I looked at the wrong original, since I made two of these low effort contributions within the same hour.
That is a little odd, isn't it? Maybe it changed? This one's CC0 as well now.
And no, speeding it up was the least effort of the three modifications, mister zero submissions.
Why?
So playful.
Did you notice Stewart swings left-handed?
Yes, that's what it looks like from your end. :)
I see your point, which is the same as mine. Namely that the asset is no tube.
Still... although nozzles are tubes by definition, tubes are cylindrical by definition. And this is clearly a conical nozzle; nontubular.
Ah, there was an image there. TPRB blocked it for me.
No, that's a hose.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bathtub
Thanks for clarifying.
Another possibility is that I looked at the wrong original, since I made two of these low effort contributions within the same hour.
That is a little odd, isn't it? Maybe it changed? This one's CC0 as well now.
And no, speeding it up was the least effort of the three modifications, mister zero submissions.
Why?
So playful.
Did you notice Stewart swings left-handed?
Yes, that's what it looks like from your end. :)
I see your point, which is the same as mine. Namely that the asset is no tube.
Still... although nozzles are tubes by definition, tubes are cylindrical by definition. And this is clearly a conical nozzle; nontubular.
Ah, there was an image there. TPRB blocked it for me.
No, that's a hose.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bathtub
Pages