@cougarmint: They can't apply DRM to the specific assets licensed CC-BY-SA. That doesn't necessarily mean closed code (a separate asset) isn't compatible. But yes, ultimately researching the licenses is the best way to know what's best for your own project.
I'm not suggesting combining the 4 into a single image, I mean have all 4 separate images available on the same submission. The previews would all remain separate. Unless there's a good reason to keep them apart, these really should be a single submission containing 4 images instead of 4 submissions containing one image each.
Groovy. I can remove the licensing issue flag as soon as the first sentence is changed. Probably something like "you are welcome to use these assets, just be sure to credit me and indicate the license CC-BY 4.0" would work.
And welcome! these are some great assets. Thanks for sharing.
The license you've selected allows for commercial use as well as non-prototype creations and futhermore does not allow additional restrictions to be placed upon the license. Would you be willing to forego those stipulations? Until then I have to mark this as a licensing issue temporarily.
EDIT: Reselling someone's CC0 art is a rotten thing to do, but it's allowed. However, artists may license different formats of their work under different licenses. Craftpix.net has done this. This asset remains CC0 and we are all free to continue enjoying it as is, but the format being sold by "DD9" is not licensed CC0, it's a proprietary license that does not allow resale: https://craftpix.net/file-licenses/
same great flavor, but now in .zip format!
@cougarmint: They can't apply DRM to the specific assets licensed CC-BY-SA. That doesn't necessarily mean closed code (a separate asset) isn't compatible. But yes, ultimately researching the licenses is the best way to know what's best for your own project.
...what? Portfolio?
I'm not suggesting combining the 4 into a single image, I mean have all 4 separate images available on the same submission. The previews would all remain separate. Unless there's a good reason to keep them apart, these really should be a single submission containing 4 images instead of 4 submissions containing one image each.
Why not just have all the bakery environment concept art on one submission?
The asset you linked to is from the FLARE set. All the assets for FLARE are as you describe and are free to use.
Try searching for "Gem". They're all openly licensed.
Groovy.
I can remove the licensing issue flag as soon as the first sentence is changed. Probably something like "you are welcome to use these assets, just be sure to credit me and indicate the license CC-BY 4.0" would work.And welcome! these are some great assets. Thanks for sharing.
The license you've selected allows for commercial use as well as non-prototype creations
and futhermore does not allow additional restrictions to be placed upon the license. Would you be willing to forego those stipulations? Until then I have to mark this as a licensing issue temporarily.P.S. There is no need to put a "2D" tag on an asset submitted to the 2D category. See https://opengameart.org/content/art-tags for effective tagging tips.
"Item no longer available"
This is the closest thing to a "report" button I could find on that site: https://help.market.envato.com/hc/en-us/articles/202822720-How-to-submit...
EDIT: Reselling someone's CC0 art is a rotten thing to do, but it's allowed. However, artists may license different formats of their work under different licenses. Craftpix.net has done this. This asset remains CC0 and we are all free to continue enjoying it as is, but the format being sold by "DD9" is not licensed CC0, it's a proprietary license that does not allow resale: https://craftpix.net/file-licenses/
Pages