If something has 2 licenses or more, you can pick any of the licenses. People putting both GPL and CC BY-SA is beacause of some projects only accepting GPL-compatible licenses (no CC license except CC0 is compatible with GPL).
CC BY-SA is weak copyleft, the license terms aren't “viral” in any way.
Remember that all CC licenses except CC0 have a “no technological restrictions” clause, which prohibits measures that would prevent users from exercising their rights.
The gradient looks too sharp to me.
Rotation is trivial for us to do, you don't have to do it.
Looks like wood. :D
If something has 2 licenses or more, you can pick any of the licenses. People putting both GPL and CC BY-SA is beacause of some projects only accepting GPL-compatible licenses (no CC license except CC0 is compatible with GPL).
CC BY-SA is weak copyleft, the license terms aren't “viral” in any way.
Remember that all CC licenses except CC0 have a “no technological restrictions” clause, which prohibits measures that would prevent users from exercising their rights.
So if this actually acceptable, I'll put up my own: http://opengameart.org/content/health-and-breath-bars
Only 512²? Why?
Very nice, but no specular and parallax maps sadly. I suppose I could generate them.
The king is too “thin”, the queen is hard to distinguish from a bishop (also too “thin”).
CC-BY means attribution is required. You want to use CC0, I guess.
Removed CC BY-SA 3.0, it's only GPL 2 or later.
I made a seamless texture of this, with normal map and parallax map, using GIMP: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/82342922/downloads/tesseract/test_te...
Previews: https://cdn.mediacru.sh/0FRaWpbAXeXl.jpg | https://cdn.mediacru.sh/wdPbFZLAgCkU.jpg
License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Pages