Commercial use isn't always pure evil. If you believe non-free licenses are unethical, then go with a copyleft license, which is what CC BY-SA is. This way, people can't release derivated works under a more restrictive one.
Creative Commons BY-NC-SA is not a free license and I wouldn't advise anyone to use it.
You don't have to put title in all-caps, it's automatically done by the web site.
Remember that you may not require people to notify you upon use of the asset, it may only be optional.
Your images say CC BY-SA 4.0, but OGA uses CC BY-SA 3.0, is this allowed?
Very cool, even though I would have liked vectors or higher resolution.
Do you have the source for these (preferably vectors)?
If you want to allow everything but require attribution, use CC BY 3.0 as a license.
Commercial use isn't always pure evil. If you believe non-free licenses are unethical, then go with a copyleft license, which is what CC BY-SA is. This way, people can't release derivated works under a more restrictive one.
Creative Commons BY-NC-SA is not a free license and I wouldn't advise anyone to use it.
See http://freedomdefined.org/Licenses/NC for more information.
Maybe, there's a forum topic: http://redeclipse.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=18
Sorry, this sounds like “enterprise” BS to me.
By the way, the WOT score card of the site <https://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/softwareshield.com> doesn't give it too much trust.
Inkscape: http://inkscape.org/
Restricting modification of files is pure evil, don't do it.
Pages