Ok thanks. I was just concerned especially since no one had caught it and may have used your work already. Also apon looking back at my previous message I realize I sound a little jerk-ish I was assuming too much when I was writing it instead of just asking if that was meant to be that way, so I apologize if it did come accross that way.
Um.. what licence do you want to go by exactly? Because here you say you want this Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 but in the zip file you say that you want something more closer to Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0. And yes there is a huge difference. The FAQ explains that the difference is the can use commercially or not, with the project being open source when not.
Ok thanks. I was just concerned especially since no one had caught it and may have used your work already. Also apon looking back at my previous message I realize I sound a little jerk-ish I was assuming too much when I was writing it instead of just asking if that was meant to be that way, so I apologize if it did come accross that way.
Um.. what licence do you want to go by exactly? Because here you say you want this Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 but in the zip file you say that you want something more closer to Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0. And yes there is a huge difference. The FAQ explains that the difference is the can use commercially or not, with the project being open source when not.