Well that's nice to hear. Honest, positive feedback makes your work feel fulfilled, even if it comes with a bit of critique. I'm not entirely sure why, but something in my head always compels me to end the song prematurely. In my next work I wil try to override that instinct.
It appears that (after some research) the MIT license is almost identical to CC0 except it only applies to software, and CC0 can be assigned to any work.
So I was looking at some Ai generated artwork on the sight, and thought it must be somewhat irritating to have a submission unavaible for such a long period of time, especially if it's your own. So I went to find some advice on the topic. And who would be best to go to for advice on how to handle AI generated art than... another AI?
Not Siri. ChatGPT.
ChatGPT said this when I told it to act as a lawyer and tell us how we should handle it:
As a lawyer, my advice would be to carefully consider the legal and ethical implications of using AI-generated artwork on OpenGameArt, and to develop a clear policy or set of guidelines to address these issues.
First, it is important to ensure that any AI-generated artwork submitted to OpenGameArt is an original creation and does not infringe on the copyrights of others. This may require reviewing the source material used to train the AI system and verifying that it was obtained legally and with the necessary permissions.
Second, the issue of authorship and ownership of AI-generated artwork may need to be addressed. It may be necessary to clarify who holds the copyright and how it should be licensed and attributed to ensure that artists and users are aware of the legal requirements.
Third, transparency and accountability in the use of AI systems should be considered. This may include providing information about the training data used, the algorithms used, and any biases that may be present in the system. It may also include providing clear information about the ownership and licensing of any AI-generated artwork used on the site.
Overall, developing a clear policy or set of guidelines for the use of AI-generated artwork on OpenGameArt can help ensure that legal and ethical issues are addressed, and that artists andusers are aware of the requirements and implications of using such works. It is recommended to consult with legal and ethical experts in the field to develop an effective policy or set of guidelines.
Most of this I believe has already been said on this topic, but I thought it would be interesting to ask another AI's opinion on it.
Bro that looks epic!
Well.... technically they said redistribution would be frowned upon, not unallowed. And CC-BY requires credit.
Hmm... That's very interesting. The fact that you could create a song of ample length based off of that is impressive!
Lol you dreamt about this?
Oh yeah!
Well that's nice to hear. Honest, positive feedback makes your work feel fulfilled, even if it comes with a bit of critique. I'm not entirely sure why, but something in my head always compels me to end the song prematurely. In my next work I wil try to override that instinct.
That, my friend, is why OpenGameArt is here.
It appears that (after some research) the MIT license is almost identical to CC0 except it only applies to software, and CC0 can be assigned to any work.
So I was looking at some Ai generated artwork on the sight, and thought it must be somewhat irritating to have a submission unavaible for such a long period of time, especially if it's your own. So I went to find some advice on the topic. And who would be best to go to for advice on how to handle AI generated art than... another AI?
Not Siri. ChatGPT.
ChatGPT said this when I told it to act as a lawyer and tell us how we should handle it:
As a lawyer, my advice would be to carefully consider the legal and ethical implications of using AI-generated artwork on OpenGameArt, and to develop a clear policy or set of guidelines to address these issues.
First, it is important to ensure that any AI-generated artwork submitted to OpenGameArt is an original creation and does not infringe on the copyrights of others. This may require reviewing the source material used to train the AI system and verifying that it was obtained legally and with the necessary permissions.
Second, the issue of authorship and ownership of AI-generated artwork may need to be addressed. It may be necessary to clarify who holds the copyright and how it should be licensed and attributed to ensure that artists and users are aware of the legal requirements.
Third, transparency and accountability in the use of AI systems should be considered. This may include providing information about the training data used, the algorithms used, and any biases that may be present in the system. It may also include providing clear information about the ownership and licensing of any AI-generated artwork used on the site.
Overall, developing a clear policy or set of guidelines for the use of AI-generated artwork on OpenGameArt can help ensure that legal and ethical issues are addressed, and that artists and users are aware of the requirements and implications of using such works. It is recommended to consult with legal and ethical experts in the field to develop an effective policy or set of guidelines.
Most of this I believe has already been said on this topic, but I thought it would be interesting to ask another AI's opinion on it.
Nice!
Pages