well im just looking for some stuff to do so im not so bored. consider these quick things CC0 and free to use. I might make some more stuff later on a bit more free time. If their unusable to you then I'll just put them up as some scraps. one of the algae things is seamless to run down walls and other things. the wall set is pretty seamless but may need some configuring.
I think that gif images should be able to play automatically on homepage and in the assets page itself. Since it does accept gif images. I also think adding in photos without needing to have them uploaded somewhere else ie imgur.
Or the OGA-by 3.0, bart put up very little info on it and even if he did it doesnt seem to hold any legal standing, more suggestive. Even though all licences are just suggestive without pricy legal representation.
Yes. I think we should get detailed info for each of the sites licensed though. Im sure we can all say other than the 'CC' licences most of them are pretty vague. Ill try to educate myself a bit more on the licencing details to see if I can help out or soeed up the process a bit. Personally the licences from GNU confuse me the most.
well im just looking for some stuff to do so im not so bored. consider these quick things CC0 and free to use. I might make some more stuff later on a bit more free time. If their unusable to you then I'll just put them up as some scraps. one of the algae things is seamless to run down walls and other things. the wall set is pretty seamless but may need some configuring.
Thank you for the fast reply and great info. Ill see what I can do.
But I dont believe that this takes much priority or is needed at all.
I think that gif images should be able to play automatically on homepage and in the assets page itself. Since it does accept gif images. I also think adding in photos without needing to have them uploaded somewhere else ie imgur.
I personally think the tag system covers this and that 2.5d should fit in the 2D category. Much like sprites rendered from 3D models should.
Im so confused by that all, I really dont know what to say.
Or the OGA-by 3.0, bart put up very little info on it and even if he did it doesnt seem to hold any legal standing, more suggestive. Even though all licences are just suggestive without pricy legal representation.
Yes. I think we should get detailed info for each of the sites licensed though. Im sure we can all say other than the 'CC' licences most of them are pretty vague. Ill try to educate myself a bit more on the licencing details to see if I can help out or soeed up the process a bit. Personally the licences from GNU confuse me the most.
If you would ever like info on swords, guns or knives then p.m me because I know a lot. I collect knives and love it all :)
May I ask your reason for doing this?
Pages