1) Fixed perspective of overall image to make it more square
2) Copy-pasted bits around to get correct perspective on grating
3) Cropped to tileable portion
4) Made seamless and used clone tool to remove seams
5) Sharpened detail with high-pass filter
6) Painted over blown out highlights with mask derived from 'threshold'
7) Scale down to power of 2 (1024px) for game asset use
8) Exported at 95% quality (non-optimized)
@capbros yes I had briefly considered that as well, however now I think a better solution might be to have a separate page that tracks your downloads (within the last 30 days?) and individual downloads would be selected to generate a downloadable manifest of the assets. Think that'd work?
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, this isn't legal advice!
If you are the sole author of a work (it is not derived from a copyrighted asset), there should be no fundamental issue with marking the submission as OGA-BY 3 (which allows anyone to relicense to CC-BY-3.0), and also dual licensing by marking it as CC-BY-3.0 (because CC allows re-release as later version of CC), AND triple licensing it by commenting with the submission that it's CC-BY-4.0...
Sole authors of works licensed as CC-BY-4.0 can relicense their own (non derivative) work as CC-BY-3.0. This isn't true of other people's stuff. I can't grab a CC-BY-4.0 asset off of another site and post it here as being CC-BY-3.0.
Perhaps instead of asset submitters needing to set all this manually, display that any OGA-BY 3 asset is 'available under alternate license' and show CC-BY options.
Maybe always require asset submissions (that are not OGA-BY 3) to check ALL CC licenses they desire and use the most-free 'oldest' license as the 'main' one.
Idea: Optionally select to bundle a copy of the (plain text) license(s) of the thing you are downloading with the download.
So, would it be better to upload the entire music collection to Jamendo? OGA should probably encourage users uploading music to go there instead. I don't see the purpose of having the music on OGA if it is difficult to find, and impractical to host/serve.
Also, I second the suggestion from @Botanic to use resumable uploads. i had to upload each of the images for my Lunar Rock submission individually because the .zip upload kept timing out.
made dirt_2.png tile more seamlessly @ 1024px, heavily remixed mud @ 512px
Here's some additional source (generated) assets - probably to aid in creation of something more game-ready.
Nice stuff! That first texture is also begging to become some kind of stained glass. What's the app?
You're welcome! It was a good excuse to try out my new tablet. Cheers
4x upscale including jump anims by @davenewton
1) Fixed perspective of overall image to make it more square
2) Copy-pasted bits around to get correct perspective on grating
3) Cropped to tileable portion
4) Made seamless and used clone tool to remove seams
5) Sharpened detail with high-pass filter
6) Painted over blown out highlights with mask derived from 'threshold'
7) Scale down to power of 2 (1024px) for game asset use
8) Exported at 95% quality (non-optimized)
@capbros yes I had briefly considered that as well, however now I think a better solution might be to have a separate page that tracks your downloads (within the last 30 days?) and individual downloads would be selected to generate a downloadable manifest of the assets. Think that'd work?
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, this isn't legal advice!
If you are the sole author of a work (it is not derived from a copyrighted asset), there should be no fundamental issue with marking the submission as OGA-BY 3 (which allows anyone to relicense to CC-BY-3.0), and also dual licensing by marking it as CC-BY-3.0 (because CC allows re-release as later version of CC), AND triple licensing it by commenting with the submission that it's CC-BY-4.0...
Sole authors of works licensed as CC-BY-4.0 can relicense their own (non derivative) work as CC-BY-3.0. This isn't true of other people's stuff. I can't grab a CC-BY-4.0 asset off of another site and post it here as being CC-BY-3.0.
Perhaps instead of asset submitters needing to set all this manually, display that any OGA-BY 3 asset is 'available under alternate license' and show CC-BY options.
Maybe always require asset submissions (that are not OGA-BY 3) to check ALL CC licenses they desire and use the most-free 'oldest' license as the 'main' one.
Idea: Optionally select to bundle a copy of the (plain text) license(s) of the thing you are downloading with the download.
So, would it be better to upload the entire music collection to Jamendo? OGA should probably encourage users uploading music to go there instead. I don't see the purpose of having the music on OGA if it is difficult to find, and impractical to host/serve.
Also, I second the suggestion from @Botanic to use resumable uploads. i had to upload each of the images for my Lunar Rock submission individually because the .zip upload kept timing out.
Pages