O my lord, that was funny. I was listening to your song and I thought my itunes went off. >.< Right at :54 and on I believe the instrument the notes played and the pitch is the same thing as the itunes cd completion sound. It was just funny because the song made me open my cd tray.
Also with that being said. with too hard of a ration control it is a very good idea to, if you have a very dynamic volume level in the track, to use automation with the compression. I have seen some programs not even have automation when automation is actually 1 of the key things that seperates a audio program from a Digital Audio workstation (D.A.W). So make sure you have a program that has automation,expandability,flexability,integration, and communication speed like real D.A.W before getting this precise in your final product.
Well, When I dont know much about this stuff. But when I opened up the picture, someone next to me asked if it was a baby? I really do think its the head that is big. does anyone also feel the torso is small?
Well I will say almost because we still use outside free resources. I think at one point it will be so organized and so much stuff on here that we wont even need to do that.
I wont say its the coolest place on the interwebz so we all dont get a big head. But I believe it has potential of being a "go-to" site for open source projects.
But if you want to transpose the sound of your recording you need to make sure that the sound recorded is high quality and at a reasonable sample rate. Because things can drag out, glitch, pop, and even stutter when doing that and it will make it sound very blocky. plus if you want to change the pitch I def recommend you eq accordingly and maybe even multiband compressor with it
O my lord, that was funny. I was listening to your song and I thought my itunes went off. >.< Right at :54 and on I believe the instrument the notes played and the pitch is the same thing as the itunes cd completion sound. It was just funny because the song made me open my cd tray.
Also with that being said. with too hard of a ration control it is a very good idea to, if you have a very dynamic volume level in the track, to use automation with the compression. I have seen some programs not even have automation when automation is actually 1 of the key things that seperates a audio program from a Digital Audio workstation (D.A.W). So make sure you have a program that has automation,expandability,flexability,integration, and communication speed like real D.A.W before getting this precise in your final product.
To be even more honest, I dont know what it is xD. It was put together with so much stuff that its just too eclectic
Well, When I dont know much about this stuff. But when I opened up the picture, someone next to me asked if it was a baby? I really do think its the head that is big. does anyone also feel the torso is small?
Opium FTW
Well I will say almost because we still use outside free resources. I think at one point it will be so organized and so much stuff on here that we wont even need to do that.
I wont say its the coolest place on the interwebz so we all dont get a big head. But I believe it has potential of being a "go-to" site for open source projects.
I was bored so I took your sound and gave it a more up close feeling if anybody wants it.
http://www.thenihility.com/random/fwe.wav
But if you want to transpose the sound of your recording you need to make sure that the sound recorded is high quality and at a reasonable sample rate. Because things can drag out, glitch, pop, and even stutter when doing that and it will make it sound very blocky. plus if you want to change the pitch I def recommend you eq accordingly and maybe even multiband compressor with it
@qubodup I would totally agree with that but I only do audio unless someone can get an mp3 player taped on the shirt hahaha
Pages