Hey Roots, the lamp in this submission originates from Hyptosis's Mage City Arcanos. It was discovered that it is from the RPG Maker XP runtime & is not usable:
"you're working on this big project to replace a bunch of non-free art"
Exactly! Had licensing been thought through more carefully to begin with, we might not be having to do this HUGE asset replacement job. Even after we are finished, I am sure there will be residual items that we missed. We will always have to keep our eyes out for them.
I used to have a hard time with constructive criticism or people pointing out my mistakes. I would take it personally & felt like they hated me (sorry to turn this into a psychology thread). But I've worked hard to try & change that in myself & be more accepting of others' input so I can improve & fix things. :)
The file is "Victorian house/victorian house.png". There is nothing in the submission that indicates another author, so I'm assuming it is Casper Nilsson's original work.
Edit: If this has LPC components, shouldn't GPL 3.0 be listed in the licenses?
Edit: Casper Nilsson does mention that some of the works in the entry are based on LPC base assets, but I haven't found the flower box in those. So, again, I think the flower box is 100% Casper's work. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Okay, I have corrected it & listed CC BY-SA & GPL only. I made some notes in the description about separate licensing for individual files.
I guess I have misunderstood how licensing works on OGA. I thought I should list all licenses that apply to individual files within the submission. I had seen many other submissions that listed various licenses together, such as GPL, CC BY-SA, & CC0.
If it is the case that when multiple licenses are listed, the works can redistributed under any of the licenses, it seems to me that CC0 should definitely not be listed together with any other license. But I'm sure there are other things about it that I do not understand.
Edit: Thank you for pointing out my mistake & helping me understand better how licensing works. I'm sure this will not be my last error. ;)
Hey Roots, the lamp in this submission originates from Hyptosis's Mage City Arcanos. It was discovered that it is from the RPG Maker XP runtime & is not usable:https://opengameart.org/node/11192#comment-66182It should be removed/replaced in this submission.There are some variations of a lamp that Sharm created. Some of them can be seen here. Maybe you can use one of those as a replacement.Edit: Fixed by MedicineStorm
@bluecarrot16:
Exactly! Had licensing been thought through more carefully to begin with, we might not be having to do this HUGE asset replacement job. Even after we are finished, I am sure there will be residual items that we missed. We will always have to keep our eyes out for them.
I used to have a hard time with constructive criticism or people pointing out my mistakes. I would take it personally & felt like they hated me (sorry to turn this into a psychology thread). But I've worked hard to try & change that in myself & be more accepting of others' input so I can improve & fix things. :)
I appreciate the help. Thank you everyone!
The file is "Victorian house/victorian house.png". There is nothing in the submission that indicates another author, so I'm assuming it is Casper Nilsson's original work.
Edit: If this has LPC components, shouldn't GPL 3.0 be listed in the licenses?
Edit: Casper Nilsson does mention that some of the works in the entry are based on LPC base assets, but I haven't found the flower box in those. So, again, I think the flower box is 100% Casper's work. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Edit: Unrelated, but just to mention, I used the flower box in my LPC Windows Rework submission.
Okay, I have corrected it & listed CC BY-SA & GPL only. I made some notes in the description about separate licensing for individual files.
I guess I have misunderstood how licensing works on OGA. I thought I should list all licenses that apply to individual files within the submission. I had seen many other submissions that listed various licenses together, such as GPL, CC BY-SA, & CC0.
If it is the case that when multiple licenses are listed, the works can redistributed under any of the licenses, it seems to me that CC0 should definitely not be listed together with any other license. But I'm sure there are other things about it that I do not understand.
Edit: Thank you for pointing out my mistake & helping me understand better how licensing works. I'm sure this will not be my last error. ;)
Thank you Zabin! :)
Edit: Added.
Here is a preview at 50 ms delay. Seems to be a slight hiccup after last (or maybe first) frame:
Here is a preview at 50ms delay:
Idris Elba! :)
I love the shading/shine! :)
Pages