It is unlikely that there will be attack animations any time soon (unless someone else wants to take on the task). Stendhal uses an overlay for attacks & our priority right now is replacing the non-free artwork that was added to the game. We have a long list. Sorry.
@mold: Those look really nice, but I haven't decided yet if I want to add them. I guess I imagined this collection being composed of "traditional"-style (if that's the right term) statues. Those have a sci-fi futuristic look to me, but maybe they would be good additions. They are your work?
Actually, should I remove the GPL license as well, since RayaneFLX's statues are CC BY-SA only?
Edit: How would it work to merge two submissions that don't share common licensing? For example, one submission is under GPL only & the other under CC BY-SA.
Yes, there is definitely risk of abuse. That's why I changed the request to a sort by revision option. Originally I was going to simply suggest moving updated submissions to the front of the list. But that would likely result in spamming submission updates.
And honestly, I wasn't thinking of a specific submission of mine. It just came to me today because I was updating a couple older submissions.
Thank you for your input MedicineStorm. I hope the other devs like the idea of sorting by revision date & see it implemented. :)
Does that mean that GPL 3.0 -> CC BY-SA 3.0 is inherently okay (I'm guessing not)? Or is it because LPC licensing specifically states that dropping one of the licenses in favor of using the other singly is okay?
Very nice!
It is unlikely that there will be attack animations any time soon (unless someone else wants to take on the task). Stendhal uses an overlay for attacks & our priority right now is replacing the non-free artwork that was added to the game. We have a long list. Sorry.
Wow! Very professional!
@mold: Those look really nice, but I haven't decided yet if I want to add them. I guess I imagined this collection being composed of "traditional"-style (if that's the right term) statues. Those have a sci-fi futuristic look to me, but maybe they would be good additions. They are your work?
Actually, should I remove the GPL license as well, since RayaneFLX's statues are CC BY-SA only?
Edit: How would it work to merge two submissions that don't share common licensing? For example, one submission is under GPL only & the other under CC BY-SA.
Diarandor does the sprite work for the Solarus project. Not sure about tilesets though.
I think I had seen the ones from the medieval set before. But I was referring to the ones you just posted. :)
Thank you bluecarrot16!!!
Jeez bluecarrot16, you must be working your fingers to the bone!
I got especially excited when I saw the rotated flower boxes, because I have used the originals in a submission. :)
Edit: Oooh! I'm excited about the hanging banners too. Got a couple of those that need replaced in Stendhal.
Yes, there is definitely risk of abuse. That's why I changed the request to a sort by revision option. Originally I was going to simply suggest moving updated submissions to the front of the list. But that would likely result in spamming submission updates.
And honestly, I wasn't thinking of a specific submission of mine. It just came to me today because I was updating a couple older submissions.
Thank you for your input MedicineStorm. I hope the other devs like the idea of sorting by revision date & see it implemented. :)
Does that mean that GPL 3.0 -> CC BY-SA 3.0 is inherently okay (I'm guessing not)? Or is it because LPC licensing specifically states that dropping one of the licenses in favor of using the other singly is okay?
Pages