It seems that these may roughly fit a couple of remakes I'm loosely looking at working on. Should I be able to code 'em up (which I probably won't until at least this March), I'd be looking at collaborating for a better fit.
Did you change the font size proper, or just the “zoom level” setting? Typically, “zoom” is applied to both the font and the pixels (and thus images and CSS' ‘px’), although, e. g., Firefox allows the user to choose the behavior (via the ‘browser.zoom.full’ option.) On the contrary, changes to the font size per se usually don't affect the images.
BTW, the “payload area” of this site's Web pages doesn't seem to follow the changes of the browser's window own width, either. For this reason, the sizes of such areas should be expressed in “pure relative” units (that is, ‘%’), not ‘px’, ‘em’, or the like.
... And so I've got my userpic. Thanks!
PS. Got to second that we'd be delighted to as well see the source images these are generated from.
I sincerely hope that those taking the survey won't forget to mention the sites they “play” their favourite free software games from.
For instance, I've mentioned the following sites:
It seems that these may roughly fit a couple of remakes I'm loosely looking at working on. Should I be able to code 'em up (which I probably won't until at least this March), I'd be looking at collaborating for a better fit.
May make quite a Kickstarter project, I suppose.
Did you change the font size proper, or just the “zoom level” setting? Typically, “zoom” is applied to both the font and the pixels (and thus images and CSS' ‘px’), although, e. g., Firefox allows the user to choose the behavior (via the ‘browser.zoom.full’ option.) On the contrary, changes to the font size per se usually don't affect the images.
BTW, the “payload area” of this site's Web pages doesn't seem to follow the changes of the browser's window own width, either. For this reason, the sizes of such areas should be expressed in “pure relative” units (that is, ‘%’), not ‘px’, ‘em’, or the like.