Associated with Skyrim yes, but not trademarked under the same category. Bethesda's trademark is not for a hybridized fantasy race like this character.
There may be trademark implications with the term 'dragonborn' in reference to a humanoid/dragon hybrid race in a fantasy setting. Specifically the WotC IP. Would you be willing to omit that term or replace it with one that is not entangled with potential licensing issues? 'Dragonoid' or perhaps 'Zmeu', after the romanian creature of folklore with dragon and anthropomorphic features?
Creative Commons Atrribution 3.0 does not forbid redistribution or resale. In fact, allowing it is important for the license to be useful. Not because people typically want to redistribute it or resell it by itself, but because it creates huge legal complications and weird loopholes without that allowance. Generally speaking, it's pretty hard to profit from CC-BY assets anyway because the potential buyer would see the required atrribution, visit the required link that leads back here, they would see that the same assets are available for free, and not bother paying the reseller for them.
The license does, however, forbid adding extra restrictions like the stipulations above.
"No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits."
The stipulation regarding redistribution and resale is incompatible with the license you've specified. I must mark this as having a licensing issue to prevent usage you may not approve of. Please let me know if you have any questions to get this resolved.
Tags are for helping people find what they are looking for. No one is going to search for the word 'Original with a single quote on one side. And 2D is one of the tags mentioned in the art tags guidelines that you should not use, so I'm guessing you didn't actually bother to read that.
I would provide some tags for you to use but I don't know anything about this art. If you can't describe it, how would I?
The new description is indeed better, but for people who have never heard of JTTS, why would they care about this? OpenGameArt's purpose is to share art that others can use in their own game projects. If that is not why you submitted the art here, that is fine, but if there is nothing you can think of that others might use this art in their own projects outside of JTTS, then there is no purpose for it to be here and it will not qualify for the JTTS TCG contest judgment phase.
The art is good and it represents the character sid well, but it is also a simple design. If it takes others less time to make the same image themselves than it does to find it here and download it, then no one will bother using this. Again, considering it's purpose is for the JTTS contest, that's fine... but it has no reason to be on OGA if it isn't useful to people having nothing to do with JTTS. It should either be made more robust so it saves others some time over making it themselves, or it should be made easier to find with better descriptions and tags with how or what it might be used for so it saves people time by being quicker to locate. If you don't feel like those things are worth a litte more effort, I understand, but that means it will not qualify for the JTTS TCG contest judgment phase.
No response from submitter. Unless we can determine the sound effect components are from a licensed source, I must remove this submission soon.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Done.
Thanks for the edit and thanks for sharing.
Would you be willing to adjust the title as well?EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
This is the correct forum: the question is in regards to the FLARE engine's behavior to a custom script.
Associated with Skyrim yes, but not trademarked under the same category. Bethesda's trademark is not for a hybridized fantasy race like this character.
There may be trademark implications with the term 'dragonborn' in reference to a humanoid/dragon hybrid race in a fantasy setting. Specifically the WotC IP. Would you be willing to omit that term or replace it with one that is not entangled with potential licensing issues? 'Dragonoid' or perhaps 'Zmeu', after the romanian creature of folklore with dragon and anthropomorphic features?EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Oh, dang! there's a bunch more of 'em that go with this on your itch page. These are beautiful. Thanks for sharing.
Creative Commons Atrribution 3.0 does not forbid redistribution or resale. In fact, allowing it is important for the license to be useful. Not because people typically want to redistribute it or resell it by itself, but because it creates huge legal complications and weird loopholes without that allowance. Generally speaking, it's pretty hard to profit from CC-BY assets anyway because the potential buyer would see the required atrribution, visit the required link that leads back here, they would see that the same assets are available for free, and not bother paying the reseller for them.The license does, however, forbid adding extra restrictions like the stipulations above.From https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ :EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
The stipulation regarding redistribution and resale is incompatible with the license you've specified. I must mark this as having a licensing issue to prevent usage you may not approve of. Please let me know if you have any questions to get this resolved.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Well, a few things to address:
Pages