Yes, because the MIDI doesn't feature the content of the soundfont itself, the MIDI file can remain. Using the physical roland SC-88 or other physical media is fine since it is not a ripped soundfont. However, this affects all other submissions using a ripped soundfont. Are you able to list each such submission that might have used troublesome soundfonts?
I believe there are some licensing concerns with the SC-55 soundfont. Because there is a high liklihood the soundfont was ripped without proper license, any derivatives or tracks created with it may be subject to copyright trouble. Until we have more information about the license/usability of the soundfont, I must mark this submission as having a licensing issue. Please let me know if you have questions or information to share.
I believe there are some licensing concerns with the SC-55 soundfont. Because there is a high liklihood the soundfont was ripped without proper license, any derivatives or tracks created with it may be subject to copyright trouble.
Are there any other tracks you have made featuring SC-55?
Checking TinyEye or similar would only be necessary if you don't know what you put in your own assets. Are you saying you didn't make all the images you used, or that you are not able to trace the origin of imagry you didn't make yourself from scratch?
Yes, because the MIDI doesn't feature the content of the soundfont itself, the MIDI file can remain. Using the physical roland SC-88 or other physical media is fine since it is not a ripped soundfont.
However, this affects all other submissions using a ripped soundfont. Are you able to list each such submission that might have used troublesome soundfonts?EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
I believe there are some licensing concerns with the SC-55 soundfont. Because there is a high liklihood the soundfont was ripped without proper license, any derivatives or tracks created with it may be subject to copyright trouble. Until we have more information about the license/usability of the soundfont, I must mark this submission as having a licensing issue. Please let me know if you have questions or information to share.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
I believe there are some licensing concerns with the SC-55 soundfont. Because there is a high liklihood the soundfont was ripped without proper license, any derivatives or tracks created with it may be subject to copyright trouble.Are there any other tracks you have made featuring SC-55?EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Understood. Then all is fixed. Thanks for understanding.
Checking TinyEye or similar would only be necessary if you don't know what you put in your own assets. Are you saying you didn't make all the images you used, or that you are not able to trace the origin of imagry you didn't make yourself from scratch?EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Thanks. Are there any other textures or parts of other media used in creating your assets?
If you're using screenshots of commercial games in the asset, it can't be licensed CC0, hon.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Coming up on two weeks now, my dude.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Oh, I got a notification of new content, but clicked the wrong link. Sorry about that. This is the new stuff then: https://opengameart.org/content/lpc-expanded-hair
Want me to bump this for the new content?
Also an animated preview?
Pages