Well, if you're worried about conficts between CC-BY-SA and the GPL then artists who want their art to be useable in gpl'd games but also want the attribution/copyleft of that license could explictly provide an exception that the art can be paired with (L)GPL'd software without the software itself being subject to the terms of CC-BY-SA.
If the indie game is open sauce I wouldn't have adblocker on, but then I don't play stuff on compy that isn't free as in freedom so :P
Of course, if it's things like stuff on the non updateable not internet connected NES/SNES/GENESIS then I don't have as much of a problem with it being closed sauce. I do take issue with those funkey lockout measures they had though...
I don't see why you thought you could change the license. If just anyone could change jsut it from copyleft to permissive the "Share Alike" part would be utterly meaningless.
So awesome it duplicated Dome's comment. :P
Fantastic theme. Really brings to mind epic adventure/fighting evil slimey things.
Well, if you're worried about conficts between CC-BY-SA and the GPL then artists who want their art to be useable in gpl'd games but also want the attribution/copyleft of that license could explictly provide an exception that the art can be paired with (L)GPL'd software without the software itself being subject to the terms of CC-BY-SA.
LOVE LOVE LOVE
If the indie game is open sauce I wouldn't have adblocker on, but then I don't play stuff on compy that isn't free as in freedom so :P
Of course, if it's things like stuff on the non updateable not internet connected NES/SNES/GENESIS then I don't have as much of a problem with it being closed sauce. I do take issue with those funkey lockout measures they had though...
Yeah, it was the intention of the GNU GPL's authors to allow selling of GPL'd software.
To understand better you might want to learn about the license and why it was written:
What is meant by free as in freedom is articulated here: http://gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
On selling free software: http://gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html
I quite like this one. somewhat energetic feel.
I don't see why you thought you could change the license. If just anyone could change jsut it from copyleft to permissive the "Share Alike" part would be utterly meaningless.
Nice work by the way. :P
I do mind, you're getting the forums wet and you're reflecting the sun into my eyes!
I gotta say, all this LPC stuff looks fantastic. Good job everyone!
Pages