tiles-not good
Author:
Friday, December 6, 2019 - 23:19
xcvret
Collected Art:
OpenGameArt.org can automatically generate a single credits file for all of the art in this collection. Please note that, while we tried our best, this file is in no way guaranteed to be accurate, and properly attributing the work you distribute with your project remains your responsibility. You'll want to load up this file in a text editor, check to make sure everything looks good (and that any special attribution instructions are followed), and then delete the notice at the top of the file, as the notice is designed to make you look very silly if you don't check over the file and remove it.
Comments
"Not Good"???? could you explain what is not good about them, this would be feedback i can use to better the tile set and future tile sets. Thanks.
And what is the point of collecting something you think that is not good?
just so you know i resent my asset being in this collection. unless you can give me a good reason for why you think it is 'not good', i would ask you to remove it please. I'm happy to receive feedback and comments, including anything negative. I'm always looking to improve and tailor things a bit better should it be needed from the user/s, but i can't do that without something to work with. 'Not good' isn't helpful to me, or anyone looking to use my assets in their projects that happen to find it here. I spend a lot of time researching, creating and crafting what i do, and i would say i work hard to acheive the finished results and i would really apreciate it if you took the time to explain your concerns with my work. Thanks.
what if not good was the name of the project he's working on ?
@Northernnecromancer : possible, but unlikely.
@chasersgaming : it is quite well explained in the collection's description : "xcvret".
Quite clear, right ? ;-)
Seriously, like most people here, I can not understand the point in collecting art "not good" (without explaining why it would be "not good").
meh. I'm convinced that label is unrelated to the choice of content. This art has a fairly cohesive style and perspective, and is - quite frankly - all pretty darn good compared to some other art we have here on OGA. Both of which suggests this was collected here with intent separate from "not good."
It is true that these assets are actually quite good.
Maybe it was just a clumsy choice of title.
I guess we will never know for sure (unless the author of the collection explains).