32 Star Sprites
Thursday, September 1, 2016 - 13:38
Art Type:
License(s):
Collections:
Favorites:
24
Share Icons:
Preview:
Star sprites that where created from scratch using GIMP.
8 types, 4 variations of each type
The .zip files contains 1024x1024 scaled .png files. *_high_resolution.zip files contain 4192x4192 images.
Copyright/Attribution Notice:
This work, made by Viktor Hahn (Viktor.Hahn@web.de), is
licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
and the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
File(s):
giants.zip 8.5 Mb [357 download(s)] giants_high_resolution.zip 81.4 Mb [232 download(s)] main_sequence.zip 14.9 Mb [313 download(s)] main_sequence_high_resolution.zip 111.3 Mb [1013 download(s)]
Comments
Pretty cool :]
Great looking assets! Thank you very much! :)
I'd like to ask if they are meant to be used in an animation or not. I tried to do so, but I don't manage to make it look natural (the changes from one sprite to the next seem to be too big).
And now I ask mysself, if it's me who doesn't manage to animate them properly (maybe you could provide some hints then) or if the sprites are just not meant to be used in an animation, but to be used every one as a single sprite.
Thanks in advance!
They are not meant to be used for animations, just a couple of variations for each color.
I used these for a test project and just stacked the 4 frames of each coloured star, and slowed the frame rate to .25 of a second, and got a nice animated effect.
It can be done.
The page here says it's released under CC-BY 4.0 but the licenses in the .zip files say it's under CC-BY-SA 3.0. Which is it?
@Unnamed: Lunarexxy is correct. To avoid confusion, the Copyright/Attribution Notice section as well as the license.txt in the .zip files should be updated to indicate both CC-BY 3.0 and 4.0 are acceptable so that it matches the licenses listed on the left side of the page.
EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
@Lunarexxy: Good catch. The answer to your question is, it is under both licenses. Rather, it is under whichever one you prefer. You may chose the terms of CC-BY 3.0 or CC-BY 4.0.
I updated the license text.