Tomatoes game arcade machine
Thursday, November 14, 2019 - 13:58
Art Type:
Collections:
Favorites:
1
Share Icons:
Preview:
Another arcade machine, I like making them :-)
This time, I was inspired by these strange tomatoes.
Assets used :
- made by chasersgaming :
https://opengameart.org/content/arcade-gui
- made by Johann C :
https://opengameart.org/content/lpc-a-shootem-up-complete-graphic-kit
- made by VWolfdog :
Copyright/Attribution Notice:
Made by Xom Adept. https://opengameart.org/content/tomatoes-game-arcade-machine
File(s):
HTF.png 2.3 Kb [81 download(s)]
Comments
By the way, I am not very familiar with the rules related to licences.
When I make some derivative work, do I have to make my work under the same licences than the assets I used?
I am not sure, but this is what I did.
Do I have to list the authors of assets in the "Copyright/Attribution Notice" too?
Listing all the licenses used by the source material implies people can use any one of the licenses. This is not quite correct. Because it comes from multiple sources, you would need to adopt only the licenses common to all. (This includes any license that can be converted into another. For instance, CC-BY can be converted to CC-BY-SA, but CC-BY-SA cannot be converted to CC-BY)
Therefore, the only license common to all 3 is GPL. As a derivative work, you would need to change the licenses to just GPL, and you should list their attribution instructions in this submission's attribution instructions. However, the others did not list any attribution instructions, so copying the part you have in the description ("made by chasersgaming: https://opengameart.org/content/arcade-gui" etc.) into the copyright/attribution notice section should be fine.
Let me know if you have other questions. :)
OK, corrected (I am still a bit unsure about keeping both version of GPL, is it OK?). I will probably have other questions to correct it on some of my older works, so I will quite likely have other questions. In order not to flood this page with questions about it, I created a forum topic.
It could also be useful to other people who also wonder about this.
https://opengameart.org/forumtopic/derivative-art-which-licences-to-choose
EDIT : also, line breaks do not appear correctly in the copyright / attribution notice, I don't know why :(
Looks good. Yes, in this case, both GPL 2 and 3 are ok. I think GPL2 has a clause allowing it to be converted to 3, though I don't think 3 can be converted to later versions. Unsure. Regardless, that isn't the reason both versions are acceptable. VWolfdog explicitly indicated later versions of the same license would be allowed on that submission. :)
That topic seems like a good idea. I never mind answering licensing questions otherwise, though :)
The copyright/attribution notice section is meant to display text that should be put on games' credits screens and credits files. To ensure the text will always be compatible and as simple as possible for game developers to incorporate, formatting of copyright/attribution text is intentionally disallowed.